public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@systemhalted.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] x86: Move and slightly improve memset_erms
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 15:11:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFUsyfLpc+PKJcL=KuSUcwPZk3D4My2RA3caMjE0ckS1XHgoKw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFUsyfLkK-n0vNmzUYqNV9wifAGqU5b7hsU3dES0Rq8HcQsuVA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 12:32 PM Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 12:26 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 8:27 AM Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Implementation wise:
> > >     1. Remove the VZEROUPPER as memset_{impl}_unaligned_erms does not
> > >        use the L(stosb) label that was previously defined.
> > >
> > >     2. Don't give the hotpath (fallthrough) to zero size.
> > >
> > > Code positioning wise:
> > >
> > > Move L(memset_{chk}_erms) to its own file.  Leaving it in between the
> >
> >  It is ENTRY, not L.   Did you mean to move them to the end of file?
>
> Will fix L -> ENTRY for V2.

Fixed in V2.
>
> Yes it should be moved to new file in this patch. Was rebase mistake. The file
> change is in the isa raising patch. Will fix both for v2.
> >
> > > memset_{impl}_unaligned both adds unnecessary complexity to the
> > > file and wastes space in a relatively hot cache section.
> > > ---
> > >  .../multiarch/memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S     | 54 ++++++++-----------
> > >  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S b/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S
> > > index abc12d9cda..d98c613651 100644
> > > --- a/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S
> > > +++ b/sysdeps/x86_64/multiarch/memset-vec-unaligned-erms.S
> > > @@ -156,37 +156,6 @@ L(entry_from_wmemset):
> > >  #if defined USE_MULTIARCH && IS_IN (libc)
> > >  END (MEMSET_SYMBOL (__memset, unaligned))
> > >
> > > -# if VEC_SIZE == 16
> > > -ENTRY (__memset_chk_erms)
> > > -       cmp     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > > -       jb      HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (__chk_fail)
> > > -END (__memset_chk_erms)
> > > -
> > > -/* Only used to measure performance of REP STOSB.  */
> > > -ENTRY (__memset_erms)
> > > -       /* Skip zero length.  */
> > > -       test    %RDX_LP, %RDX_LP
> > > -       jnz      L(stosb)
> > > -       movq    %rdi, %rax
> > > -       ret
> > > -# else
> > > -/* Provide a hidden symbol to debugger.  */
> > > -       .hidden MEMSET_SYMBOL (__memset, erms)
> > > -ENTRY (MEMSET_SYMBOL (__memset, erms))
> > > -# endif
> > > -L(stosb):
> > > -       mov     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > > -       movzbl  %sil, %eax
> > > -       mov     %RDI_LP, %RDX_LP
> > > -       rep stosb
> > > -       mov     %RDX_LP, %RAX_LP
> > > -       VZEROUPPER_RETURN
> > > -# if VEC_SIZE == 16
> > > -END (__memset_erms)
> > > -# else
> > > -END (MEMSET_SYMBOL (__memset, erms))
> > > -# endif
> > > -
> > >  # if defined SHARED && IS_IN (libc)
> > >  ENTRY_CHK (MEMSET_CHK_SYMBOL (__memset_chk, unaligned_erms))
> > >         cmp     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > > @@ -461,3 +430,26 @@ L(between_2_3):
> > >  #endif
> > >         ret
> > >  END (MEMSET_SYMBOL (__memset, unaligned_erms))
> > > +
> > > +#if defined USE_MULTIARCH && IS_IN (libc) && VEC_SIZE == 16
> > > +ENTRY (__memset_chk_erms)
> > > +       cmp     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > > +       jb      HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (__chk_fail)
> > > +END (__memset_chk_erms)
> > > +
> > > +/* Only used to measure performance of REP STOSB.  */
> > > +ENTRY (__memset_erms)
> > > +       /* Skip zero length.  */
> > > +       test    %RDX_LP, %RDX_LP
> > > +       jz       L(stosb_return_zero)
> > > +       mov     %RDX_LP, %RCX_LP
> > > +       movzbl  %sil, %eax
> > > +       mov     %RDI_LP, %RDX_LP
> > > +       rep stosb
> > > +       mov     %RDX_LP, %RAX_LP
> > > +       ret
> > > +L(stosb_return_zero):
> > > +       movq    %rdi, %rax
> > > +       ret
> > > +END (__memset_erms)
> > > +#endif
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29 22:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-28 15:27 [PATCH v1 1/3] x86: Add definition for __wmemset_chk AVX2 RTM in ifunc impl list Noah Goldstein
2022-06-28 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] x86: Move and slightly improve memset_erms Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 19:25   ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 19:32     ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 22:11       ` Noah Goldstein [this message]
2022-06-28 15:27 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] x86: Add support for building {w}memset{_chk} with explicit ISA level Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 19:30   ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 22:12     ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 19:21 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] x86: Add definition for __wmemset_chk AVX2 RTM in ifunc impl list H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 23:08   ` Noah Goldstein
2022-07-14  3:03     ` Sunil Pandey
2022-06-29 22:12 ` [PATCH v2 " Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 22:12   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86: Move and slightly improve memset_erms Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 22:18     ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 23:09       ` Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 22:12   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86: Add support for building {w}memset{_chk} with explicit ISA level Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 22:53     ` H.J. Lu
2022-06-29 23:07 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] x86: Add definition for __wmemset_chk AVX2 RTM in ifunc impl list Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 23:07   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] x86: Move and slightly improve memset_erms Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 23:30     ` H.J. Lu
2022-07-14  3:04       ` Sunil Pandey
2022-06-29 23:07   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] x86: Add support for building {w}memset{_chk} with explicit ISA level Noah Goldstein
2022-06-29 23:28     ` H.J. Lu
2022-07-01 22:45     ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAFUsyfLpc+PKJcL=KuSUcwPZk3D4My2RA3caMjE0ckS1XHgoKw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=goldstein.w.n@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos@systemhalted.org \
    --cc=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).