diff -ru glibc-2.33.orig/benchtests/bench-strstr.c glibc-2.33/benchtests/bench-strstr.c
--- glibc-2.33.orig/benchtests/bench-strstr.c	2021-02-01 22:45:33.000000000 +0530
+++ glibc-2.33/benchtests/bench-strstr.c	2021-06-16 01:22:34.320912352 +0530
@@ -45,6 +45,8 @@
 "library functions, and _where_ in this manual you can find more specific "
 "information about them.\n";
 
+static char *chal(char *text, char *pattern);
+
 /* Simple yet efficient strstr - for needles < 32 bytes it is 2-4 times
    faster than the optimized twoway_strstr.  */
 static char *
@@ -125,6 +127,7 @@
 typedef char *(*proto_t) (const char *, const char *);
 
 IMPL (strstr, 1)
+IMPL (chal, 0)
 IMPL (twoway_strstr, 0)
 IMPL (basic_strstr, 0)
 
@@ -210,6 +213,7 @@
    increasing needle sizes.  The slowest cases of the two implementations are
    within a factor of 2 on several different microarchitectures.  */
 
+#if 0
 static void
 test_hard_needle (size_t ne_len, size_t hs_len)
 {
@@ -278,6 +282,94 @@
     putchar ('\n');
   }
 }
+#endif
+
+// Choudhary algorithm
+static char *
+chal(char *text, char *pattern)
+{
+
+#define false 0
+#define true 1
+#define ALPHABET_SIZE 256
+
+    long i = 0;
+    long index = 0;
+    long end_index = 0;
+    int not_found = false;
+
+    long text_len = strlen(text);
+    long pattern_len = strlen(pattern);
+
+    long pi_44 = pattern_len - 1;
+    long pi_34 = (3 * pattern_len) / 4;
+    long pi_24 = pattern_len / 2;
+    long pi_14 = pattern_len / 4;
+
+    long fps = 0;
+    long skip_table[ALPHABET_SIZE] = {0};
+
+    // preprocess pattern and fill skip_table
+    for (i = 0; i < pattern_len; i++) {
+        skip_table[(int)(pattern[i])] = pattern_len - 1 - i;
+    }
+
+    // now search
+    for (i = 0; i < text_len; i++) {
+
+        if ((text_len - i) < pattern_len) {
+                //printf("\tfps = %ld\n", fps);
+            return NULL;
+            //return -1;
+        }
+
+        if (pattern[pi_44] != text[i + pi_44]) {
+            if (skip_table[(int)(text[i + pi_44])] > 0) {
+                i = i + skip_table[(int)(text[i + pi_44])] - 1;
+            }
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        if (pattern[0] != text[i]) {
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        if (pattern[pi_24] != text[i + pi_24]) {
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        if (pattern[pi_34] != text[i + pi_34]) {
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        if (pattern[pi_14] != text[i + pi_14]) {
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        fps = fps + 1;
+        end_index = i + pi_44;
+        not_found = false;
+
+        for (index = i; index <= end_index; index++) {
+            if (text[index] != pattern[index - i]) {
+                not_found = true;
+                break;
+            }
+        } // end of inner for loop
+
+        if (not_found == false) { // match is found
+            //printf("\tfps = %ld\n", fps);
+            return (text + i);
+            //return i;
+        }
+
+    } // end of outer for loop
+
+                //printf("\tfps = %ld\n", fps);
+    return NULL;
+    //return -1;
+
+} // end of chal
 
 static int
 test_main (void)
@@ -292,20 +384,21 @@
   for (size_t hlen = 64; hlen <= 256; hlen += 32)
     for (size_t klen = 1; klen <= 16; klen++)
       {
-	do_test (1, 3, hlen, klen, 0);
-	do_test (0, 9, hlen, klen, 1);
+	//do_test (1, 3, hlen, klen, 0);
+	//do_test (0, 9, hlen, klen, 1);
       }
 
-  for (size_t hlen = 256; hlen <= 65536; hlen *= 2)
-    for (size_t klen = 16; klen <= 256; klen *= 2)
+  for (size_t hlen = 1024; hlen <= 65536; hlen *= 2)
+    //for (size_t klen = 16; klen <= 256; klen *= 2)
+    for (size_t klen = 1024; klen <= hlen; klen *= 2)
       {
 	do_test (1, 11, hlen, klen, 0);
 	do_test (14, 5, hlen, klen, 1);
       }
 
-  test_hard_needle (64, 65536);
-  test_hard_needle (256, 65536);
-  test_hard_needle (1024, 65536);
+  //test_hard_needle (64, 65536);
+  //test_hard_needle (256, 65536);
+  //test_hard_needle (1024, 65536);
 
   return ret;
 }