From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lj1-x244.google.com (mail-lj1-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::244]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FCF43848022 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 13:58:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 2FCF43848022 Received: by mail-lj1-x244.google.com with SMTP id d2so16259747ljj.11 for ; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 06:58:34 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dvvFfgxjIWhPHdRXFMQdq/mxXsYsBHPi0gWoXSC9KmQ=; b=BlHQSMWXsUWPDGXDtOrennQyaqoCwRdi5A9xurRsBG7pXOFx6WK67bFgJldbu+RmvZ J4/cdDqmATWsfG6Wd6AkDvy62n9olcDijtrmySDcrjE+kjmMSt3TfVEINcq73T5C6d8i CkFcgDX94WrfE4Yg/QCdz2B/cnKRN9ckGvC+QRt1BF11IHOFjhpD1gX85/hYLctc0Zqo SgN334fl3+ADUEVhqoIskBYRWx6ERDyDHkZ35WgowR1S6aHbq4U1R8KKRPV/xDZO0kgZ DmRuV5haOpXms/mJylze+ZWaDQ8kc2Gm7am52OO/LGRK/ZcCHKOtu1hjFYEjOWZdTAYX uG1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IWBmNQJFTrXvofQ9AJOErHFyNd/oh/3An1TaNtJPwlF5ttRxl kgPYIaNXi2nDCieDoEe8lkxCr/gbR7PynRndOgY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx2OE0S4f+ZUINLB3fTlnHXaHqa5JENVl2qlOImGXKreiFsxQJyzpFicHMKntizHVpS+5EyWV/vVuMvRbLSBmU= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:2f14:: with SMTP id v20mr10254946ljv.363.1623592713089; Sun, 13 Jun 2021 06:58:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <419466EF-C886-472A-9A50-7DC1239BA17E@linaro.org> <567aefb8-3769-72de-146f-7c45ab54ad12@gotplt.org> In-Reply-To: <567aefb8-3769-72de-146f-7c45ab54ad12@gotplt.org> From: Amit Choudhary Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 19:28:19 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Your toxic comments. To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: Adhemerval Zanella , GNU C Library X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, LOTS_OF_MONEY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2021 13:58:36 -0000 I am done with all this now. I am not going to respond to your comments. I am starting a new job from tomorrow which is paying me $150,000 per anum for writing 4G / 5G code which the whole world will use in a few months. Need to write code for balanced b-trees for my new job and code for eNB node. I would better focus on that now. Amit On Sun, Jun 13, 2021, 7:16 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On 6/13/21 2:28 PM, Amit Choudhary wrote: > > There I read that you failed to qualify for IIT (twice) and you went > > into a year long depression. > > > > This means that you are not a very intelligent person. > > > > I had passed IIT JEE exam and did Computer Science from IIT-Varanasi. > > > > This means that I am more intelligent than you. > > OK, PM me your mailing address I'll mail you a t-shirt that says that :) > > On 6/13/21 5:26 PM, Amit Choudhary wrote: > > Siddhesh started all this by making stupid comments. I will write here > > what he wrote: > > I don't think you deserve an explanation of my review guidelines from me > after the vile personal attack you launched on me. In fact, most of > them are reiterations of what other reviewers have said in the past but > you either haven't read them or haven't understood them. But don't > worry, those comments are mostly targeted at other reviewers who (if > they choose to endure your conversation style) may choose to engage with > you. > > > ============== > > > > At this point, just before Siddhesh sent his meaningless mail, > > everything was coming on track. I sent results, and Paul asked me to > > improve my algorithm and things were taking shape. But then Siddhesh's > > email derailed it all. > > It was not 'coming on track' and my intervention was necessary because > (1) as one of the maintainers of glibc it is my responsibility to > reiterate the review standards for the project when I see gaps and (2) > you've been misinterpreting the politeness of the community members as > compliance. You would have run into all those issues later even if I > had not iterated them. You literally expressed surprise at a couple of > them as if they weren't mentioned in the thread before. > > Finally, this is my last email to you until you are more respectful in > your language. > > Siddhesh >