From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-69101-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 129054 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2016 13:18:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 129045 invoked by uid 89); 23 Apr 2016 13:18:24 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=laptops, sounded, fwdenebenyode, severe
X-HELO: mail-ob0-f169.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=w1EMBC5/3+9uMFJ5zzPaxPAd8RFFWgohheyQ23CixbI=;
        b=W3ng8T/3Amp2GMbngwpWIdBmjd4K/rHBKMK63YNHTiNeg2c2LIlQQQY+3R2lPbsuhl
         RBTSERxmv+UoJxoYSV5FkdEm/5tvb2GX1UQY65SRd24qN4Zv03fyCx67GB8ZcGuW8UxX
         rD7cpKm+MggvoDNRQ7qB9ARfL9+EfHYNQBWOkgb4ty9rragiqu8+aXEFUBJ84SFqBeOo
         ZFog2K5AaW+xnZolOrMu1JcUG3q1OmGhusd8FMY3lSsFk+u98Z2Zjs4sgXb3pK14HqEO
         uMXIH5YALrc+qZgrkFOdvP6X1JZ5Q6MwhWqe76qdVCvBEGfynAh9HJfQC8qsXzGrXLin
         /uPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUpx0K5+zX7nmkuaVKlaodeJ062Jy0ePPykmTLeU/Yngg2MgaM6Dh58gLopTYvCIdPORkM061xeSeHlPg==
X-Received: by 10.182.55.102 with SMTP id r6mr11563423obp.72.1461417488572;
 Sat, 23 Apr 2016 06:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87vb38jzss.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <1461298610-19221-1-git-send-email-vapier@gentoo.org>
 <87a8klk4jp.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <CAHdAatZf+6OQrRjBSmOUHw34-TYH0zvNAqA9G3K-1DQE_XmMnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87vb38jzss.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
From: Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 13:18:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAHdAatZLj9L1gmjqr0=GXW=LAGTGS5rOJbCGqpvoF9s5ewf-Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] localedata: en_NL: new English in the Netherlands locale
 [BZ #14085]
To: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, 
	Pander Musubi <pander@users.sourceforge.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00587.txt.bz2

On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote:

> If desktop environments refuse to add the user interface for this, or
> can't arrange for the installation or generation of the required
> locales, this isn't really our fault.  If we aggressively increase the
> number of locales, it is likely that only a subset of them make it to
> the user due to installation size concerns.

I do take the argument about size to heart. It is an important issue
on XO laptops that deploy Sugar.  We use an image-builder to customize
languages (locales, translations) included because we face such severe
hardware restrictions on storage.

I apologize if my question sounded exasperated, thank you for the
thoughtful response.

cjl