[PATCH] locale: iso-639: add Talossan language [BZ #19400]

[PATCH] locale: iso-639: add Talossan language [BZ #19400]

[Mike Frysinger]

From: Robin van der Vliet <info@robinvandervliet.com>

---
 locale/iso-639.def | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/locale/iso-639.def b/locale/iso-639.def
index 4bea116..e9c1dd3 100644
--- a/locale/iso-639.def
+++ b/locale/iso-639.def
@@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tagalog", tl, tgl, tgl)
 DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tahitian", ty, tah, tah)
 DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Tai (Other)", tai, tai)
 DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tajik", tg, tgk, tgk)
+DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Talossan", tzl, tzl)
 DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Tamashek", tmh, tmh)
 DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tamil", ta, tam, tam)
 DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tatar", tt, tat, tat)
-- 
2.7.4

Re: [PATCH] locale: iso-639: add Talossan language [BZ #19400]

[Chris Leonard]

How sure are we that Talossan actually landed in ISO-639 as tzl?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talossa

I do not dispute that Klingon is actually in there as tlh, but I have
not come across Talossan before and I spend a fair amount of time
looking at the ISO639 PO files.

Maybe they can use something from the range

#. Name for qaa-qtz
msgid "Reserved for local use"
msgstr ""

If it is supported in localedef.

My concern is not the frivolous nature of the language, but that they
might be attempting to "squat" in protected namespace.

cjl


On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> From: Robin van der Vliet <info@robinvandervliet.com>
>
> ---
>  locale/iso-639.def | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/locale/iso-639.def b/locale/iso-639.def
> index 4bea116..e9c1dd3 100644
> --- a/locale/iso-639.def
> +++ b/locale/iso-639.def
> @@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tagalog", tl, tgl, tgl)
>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tahitian", ty, tah, tah)
>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Tai (Other)", tai, tai)
>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tajik", tg, tgk, tgk)
> +DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Talossan", tzl, tzl)
>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Tamashek", tmh, tmh)
>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tamil", ta, tam, tam)
>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tatar", tt, tat, tat)
> --
> 2.7.4
>

Re: [PATCH] locale: iso-639: add Talossan language [BZ #19400]

[Chris Leonard]

I withdraw my objection, tzl is defined as Talossan in iso639-3

http://www-01.sil.org/iso639-3/chg_detail.asp?id=2012-070&lang=tzl

cjl

On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 8:23 AM, Chris Leonard <cjlhomeaddress@gmail.com> wrote:
> How sure are we that Talossan actually landed in ISO-639 as tzl?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talossa
>
> I do not dispute that Klingon is actually in there as tlh, but I have
> not come across Talossan before and I spend a fair amount of time
> looking at the ISO639 PO files.
>
> Maybe they can use something from the range
>
> #. Name for qaa-qtz
> msgid "Reserved for local use"
> msgstr ""
>
> If it is supported in localedef.
>
> My concern is not the frivolous nature of the language, but that they
> might be attempting to "squat" in protected namespace.
>
> cjl
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 3:47 AM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> From: Robin van der Vliet <info@robinvandervliet.com>
>>
>> ---
>>  locale/iso-639.def | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/locale/iso-639.def b/locale/iso-639.def
>> index 4bea116..e9c1dd3 100644
>> --- a/locale/iso-639.def
>> +++ b/locale/iso-639.def
>> @@ -454,6 +454,7 @@ DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tagalog", tl, tgl, tgl)
>>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tahitian", ty, tah, tah)
>>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Tai (Other)", tai, tai)
>>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tajik", tg, tgk, tgk)
>> +DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Talossan", tzl, tzl)
>>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE3 ("Tamashek", tmh, tmh)
>>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tamil", ta, tam, tam)
>>  DEFINE_LANGUAGE_CODE ("Tatar", tt, tat, tat)
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>>