From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com [185.125.188.123]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FC8B3858403 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:55:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7FC8B3858403 Received: from mail-pj1-f70.google.com (mail-pj1-f70.google.com [209.85.216.70]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-relay-internal-1.canonical.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84BF73F1B7 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pj1-f70.google.com with SMTP id mn13-20020a17090b188d00b001a64f277c1eso3934787pjb.2 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:55:37 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=9tdyI2Ya0tLeRlT7r3o4Umc3J5rqqT3rcuvuap1OXZo=; b=vM7N2lmbm/jgyPu9WVfv+S81dBzKrz6HEvvt3xG0PhijsqN0sBxz4bukvUxfSWXJWY Lx59/yznBm6kkUPdbI0o7S5nG8/lVq8GUDR5NJPCsyA5BHdji62eGI1N5BCmSEkWFxzC unTcwRVE03yF9bBfRVNOuQm6uk0gqSWgv85kztASBxayGWRKUpuFmG8OspnsyFyEx+wA wqN2x5t75DYacyAKqswnF2gQiuwtEGJhkLBF0VdwB4HPCRRsTlubZkAueDWZcKNHlbv7 LginmLIhizAXNiqIE+qPj6oed4woO/BO2OiOKQOLKx23kntEfygdw+b7LWPHln2KBuUH /vYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5304cci3987RGz1MvYyjnEB/aBSu5hBbP4rNN5LMZL939MoujFd5 m1XqbBLzoktjmw/KpEBcavJqbtwPq2kfyhy8+Bd76yiTJr23L9tt0+PfM2Pap+CQQHwIjx1Mrme FM6t0tAbBeBtClHmBFg6ET0vj3bmyekopvg8AxF+97pLvTVhK1Jzkng== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1b22:: with SMTP id b34mr13772008pgb.331.1637805336049; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:55:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxwHmVSZLobuvOf2EsDG1uuBBB8R1hj4Lg+jEJQRSorrNVvxubxLpUnqoindkg517/wNm4rxPlrdERESFZL/Lk= X-Received: by 2002:a63:1b22:: with SMTP id b34mr13771991pgb.331.1637805335818; Wed, 24 Nov 2021 17:55:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87a6i4e9ej.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <1830a8cb-e52e-aa03-b8dc-9dda2d697582@redhat.com> <87a6i383j9.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> <87czmy6bc3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87czmy6bc3.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> From: Michael Hudson-Doyle Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 14:55:24 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: glibc build failure due to Systemtap probe change To: Florian Weimer Cc: Stan Cox , Stefan Liebler , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, systemtap@sourceware.org, Arjun Shankar X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, HTML_MESSAGE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.29 X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 01:55:40 -0000 Hi, On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 04:47, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha < libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote: > * Stan Cox: > > >> Is there a way way to use STAP_PROBE_ASM without supplying the template? > >> There's no type inspection in assembler, after all. > > > > Can you send me the failing .i file so I can experiment with it? > > --save-temps did not work for me for some reason, so I'm attaching -E > and -E -fdirectives-only output. > > I think I got Fedora rawhide s390x building again, so it's not *very* > time-critical, but I really don't want to release Fedora 36 with our own > private copy of . But that release still some months away. > Is there any update on this? I just ran into it with my snapshot build for Ubuntu. I can borrow/steal Florian's fix for now too but I too would prefer not to release 22.04 with it... Cheers, mwh