From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com (mail-ej1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51AE33858D32 for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 16:49:01 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 51AE33858D32 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-96f5d651170so903519866b.1 for ; Mon, 29 May 2023 09:49:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1685378940; x=1687970940; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9xEKMQWYjdnt1gaS6qH6PZzUrvA8v/3YWwaTVaLAdKk=; b=oGN2qSO/zEUGWCpybc1oYlm+oLQkv6dtUzn62s9u5X2URUcXEmpg6FWFDjdOTIcsc0 RyLjV6Kmd84c7rDOTlDphy/tLOm0lDO+nmRrdLREycCHsp4mpKW7UIOGBAaEMD5nyB7M 45NZHXHhKCoIFtstQnBDaUABJd7x49QyeSyBGJhbh4nuE2/lz82ScSwL3y2VDzJnr/h8 +Ev0cD32h37MROwwUdFcWPeNDdexEdl7F1Nh+GVWFXol6DhL1sYc4xDelm+NGU/yJovG Uf6AddIo+sabREgU11Gv/PX9K/pT9pFujOUjpaC9harwnbUkzr6kUkb6kixgtkxRvUYV ak3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1685378940; x=1687970940; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=9xEKMQWYjdnt1gaS6qH6PZzUrvA8v/3YWwaTVaLAdKk=; b=S7gaebEv2/ghUFr7/o/1tgii5wZMzn+slV1JESU+FIoI34DPvql7nfAUDPgWIEKd2E 8cyZaQsVYriV9AFBllCHz3CGlV8Dbd3/zX1nThTFPkUFt0GX0lewnwbhvSNlpkvXoQSn GkJMZaHF/8bgeHh31N2T7ySmVpqiAlD/B8O+rCAtiUfwtNhi8Q1gehO2Fx6REt5TH29k nySze3UfaX9Pfp3yvk2cWPkKxTngt8LgigHd/cI5hYEmNRZZOk7hwMBnO3EghD1ynuWv 5vJXgCALmhvM8fwxqr0hcK9NTvEhZHK9VWUTcIPBpTvE9Fkc4JNZteGEgw31tl2q/L5q rwMw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyM/vIIzbsBVkX0hnxVjoQlNaxJyySLkRJIfvDVtUgQlUqIda/H RqdsXy/2qaWP3XXH71fdUIY1dnCMN0byRJT9sSg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ4PYAgkerYSR1BvABbhwl04QHT0EzshRIDxphlitDM6saA59rak1x2mWTzR4vjXaGePFIRDWeUeEOTVitrD3os= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:168d:b0:96a:649b:3972 with SMTP id hc13-20020a170907168d00b0096a649b3972mr7812932ejc.0.1685378939568; Mon, 29 May 2023 09:48:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230525124503.152721-1-dridi.boukelmoune@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Dridi Boukelmoune Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 16:48:22 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH glibc] posix: Add error message for EAI_OVERFLOW To: Arjun Shankar Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: > It would be nice to have a new test for gai_strerror: whether it > returns a unique string for each of the errors it should handle. It > also seems that `gai_strerror (0)` returns "Unknown error". It would > be nice if it returned "Success" instead. strerror already does the > same, presumably from sysdeps/gnu/errlist.h. Would you be interested > in fixing one or both of these up? I will have a look at how glibc is tested and give it a try. Dridi