From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-88916-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 72610 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2018 15:53:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 72601 invoked by uid 89); 7 Jan 2018 15:53:34 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:519
X-HELO: mailbackend.panix.com
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mIrUzEtGCaEZT1VRl4FoucfRFkp3cbfPfWOIAdUxDXgYzYe5/eJ
	tESTogLe2ARY9LhRyyLzUhNB1gR/CQ5qCXKkCOw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotusIciKAeqKtWmPQm7sHw97I5aFHkqKVNeY2ij8F0QU5UL9WGZ63nI+3WbKqwXRzmIPPddxtPbfuvbuSmaFPs=
X-Received: by 10.202.228.5 with SMTP id b5mr4758134oih.249.1515340410582;
 Sun, 07 Jan 2018 07:53:30 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <87shbhvp0l.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
References: <20180107030543.GA7248@altlinux.org> <m2wp0uhybl.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
 <20180107113348.GA11932@altlinux.org> <87shbhvp0l.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2018 15:53:00 -0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAKCAbMg0iwGkRf0wFHpUHkPF0jm18SdiMBijod5aq_T5LFJ=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKCAbMg0iwGkRf0wFHpUHkPF0jm18SdiMBijod5aq_T5LFJ=Sg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux: make getcwd(3) fail if it cannot obtain an
 absolute path [BZ #22679]
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2018-01/txt/msg00220.txt.bz2

On Sun, Jan 7, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Jan 07 2018, "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org> wrote:
>
>> Sure, but the generic getcwd sets errno to ENOENT in this case.
>> Do you suppose that ENOENT is more appropriate than EACCES?
>
> Yes, the anchor no longer exists.

http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/functions/getcwd.html
does not license getcwd to fail with ENOENT.

zw