public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
To: melnikov.sergey.v@gmail.com
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: system and popen fail in case of big application
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2018 22:44:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKCAbMgVg8RyKeEZi40EL2CG=V859RYS541YGMHS4dyTp_mVWg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD_cgayCbmsmXY9PEt+bn1VYiGj=B_oSVMZAvt+6vOdJgoG0tQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 6:16 PM Sergey Melnikov
<melnikov.sergey.v@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm developing JNI code for a Java application. My code works fine in
> case of small heap size. Nevertheless, if I set heap size to something
> reasonably big (like 20Gb on my dev PC with 32Gb of RAM), 'popen' and
> 'system' glibc calls don't work with ENOMEM errno.
>
> So, my question is if does it worth to rewrite existing popen/system
> calls with posix_spawn as StackOverflow recommends? If so, I may
> implement and contribute this to glibc.

What would be worthwhile is to change popen and system so that they
internally use *vfork*, on systems where vfork is not the same as
fork. posix_spawn is just an elaborate and inconvenient wrapper around
vfork, and I don't think we should be using it internally or
encouraging its use by others.  Also, unlike vfork, it does not
guarantee to avoid the problem you are experiencing.

zw

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-09 22:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-09 22:16 Sergey Melnikov
2018-09-09 22:44 ` Zack Weinberg [this message]
2018-09-09 22:47   ` Zack Weinberg
2018-09-09 23:27     ` Sergey Melnikov
2018-09-09 23:49       ` Zack Weinberg
2018-09-10  2:50         ` Martin Buchholz
2018-09-10 15:38       ` Joseph Myers
2018-09-10 15:42         ` Zack Weinberg
2018-09-10 15:43           ` Joseph Myers
     [not found]       ` <CA+kOe0_1k_PbJ-pjHznP4AmTJUgziAdT+4vCcCRSb7GGdvbv7Q@mail.gmail.com>
2018-09-10 15:59         ` Zack Weinberg
2018-09-10 16:55           ` Martin Buchholz
2018-09-11 20:16   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-09-12 16:30     ` Zack Weinberg
2018-09-12 19:46       ` Martin Buchholz
2018-09-13  1:27         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-09-13  6:31           ` Andreas Schwab
2018-09-13 12:30             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-09-18  1:18           ` Martin Buchholz
2018-09-18  1:59             ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-09-18  2:18               ` Martin Buchholz
2018-09-18  4:31               ` Rich Felker
2018-09-12 23:08       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2018-09-13 12:11       ` Szabolcs Nagy
2018-09-14 18:42         ` Zack Weinberg
2018-09-17 10:32           ` Szabolcs Nagy
2018-09-17 18:27             ` Adhemerval Zanella

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKCAbMgVg8RyKeEZi40EL2CG=V859RYS541YGMHS4dyTp_mVWg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=zackw@panix.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=melnikov.sergey.v@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).