From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 54502 invoked by alias); 28 Feb 2020 17:53:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 54481 invoked by uid 89); 28 Feb 2020 17:53:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=surprised X-HELO: mailbackend.panix.com MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200219181057.10297-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com> <20200219181057.10297-2-alistair.francis@wdc.com> In-Reply-To: From: Zack Weinberg Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 17:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] sysv/linux: Rename alpha functions to be alpha specific To: Adhemerval Zanella Cc: GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2020-02/txt/msg01093.txt.bz2 On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 12:30 PM Adhemerval Zanella wrote: > On 19/02/2020 15:10, Alistair Francis wrote: > > These functions are alpha specifc, rename them to be clear. > > > > Let's also rename the header file from tv32-compat.h to > > alpha-tv32-compat.h. This is to avoid conflicts with the one we will > > introduce later. > > > > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Majewski > > My understanding is Zack has raise a strong objetion with this patch. > I would also like to make this patch move forward, so Zack do you > still have objections about this? If so, what do you propose instead? I want alpha to use the same tv32-compat.h as all the other architectures that need these conversions. I thought the previous round of discussion had come up with a plan to make that happen, so I'm surprised to see it hasn't. What happened there? zw