From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24899 invoked by alias); 14 Nov 2015 20:41:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 24793 invoked by uid 89); 14 Nov 2015 20:41:17 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mailbackend.panix.com MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.114.1 with SMTP id jc1mr4322434wjb.78.1447533668903; Sat, 14 Nov 2015 12:41:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20151113234333.D1DCA2C3B7B@topped-with-meat.com> Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2015 20:41:00 -0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: RFC: remove from From: Zack Weinberg To: Andreas Schwab Cc: Roland McGrath , GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2015-11/txt/msg00276.txt.bz2 On Sat, Nov 14, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > Roland McGrath writes: > >> What do the modern BSDs do about this issue? > > Nothing, they have the same problem. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sys/sys/types.h?view=markup#l356 > > (__BSD_VISIBLE is the equivalent of __USE_BSD.) However, if I'm reading these headers correctly, FreeBSD does *not* include sys/types.h in stdlib.h. (It does include sys/_types.h but I think that's their equivalent of bits/types.h - nothing but __names.) Perhaps that is a lower-risk change for us. I am going to talk to the people who do Debian archive rebuilds about trying both possibilities. (If we still had it, this might be an appropriate thing to put under __FAVOR_BSD, but I see it's gone, and it doesn't seem important enough to resurrect it for.) zw