From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-91195-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 75171 invoked by alias); 21 Mar 2018 14:01:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 74925 invoked by uid 89); 21 Mar 2018 14:01:57 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mailbackend.panix.com
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7EFD0gcCZj75LbQ/GorOOPReJ37M5jUVp3ekgov0fc0DCqO4W/l
	8xCWS1TYqv4PEZcpgKhWWYUU/HGpD7s5dkHj2a4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELuEw1S2Lq9Gow9r6f7o4zqA8SXUl8sh8MkzCNEW7GE0hNLVYaFHCTS8x7qxxodUv/rzjZJ/mzdiixcqjQ4N8vQ=
X-Received: by 10.202.191.87 with SMTP id p84mr3558519oif.64.1521640912802;
 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 07:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <mvmr2odfs1h.fsf@suse.de>
References: <20180321010551.9611-1-zackw@panix.com> <mvm8talhks9.fsf@suse.de>
 <CAKCAbMgmcAgoXZcZ=Dfy5V25+xbaTRj2ZWVP9YPBLhf1gm=Vaw@mail.gmail.com> <mvmr2odfs1h.fsf@suse.de>
From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2018 14:01:00 -0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAKCAbMjGmrJb4iJBncPTxQa--Exgu0QB4=_mQRKu3dNLyk5SzA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAKCAbMjGmrJb4iJBncPTxQa--Exgu0QB4=_mQRKu3dNLyk5SzA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Introduce pt-compat-stubs and use it to replace
 pt-vfork. (Architecture maintainer feedback wanted.)
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2018-03/txt/msg00502.txt.bz2

On Wed, Mar 21, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> wrote:
> I'd suggest to file a binutils bug.

I suppose that's an option, but I'd rather look for approaches
entirely within libc first.