public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: Remove add-ons mechanism
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 22:01:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKCAbMjrESb7_3=9ueuMKWeHwBJ9q_8_TdtojPejNPCr3JEUrw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709281748010.30081@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>
> Add-ons involve significant, little-used complexity in the glibc build
> system, and make it hard to understand what the space of possible
> glibc configurations is.  This patch removes the add-ons mechanism.

I don't disagree with this patch exactly, but I was thinking of using
the add-ons mechanism to prototype a CSPRNG addition to glibc and I'd
like to ask how you think that should be done instead (and more
generally, how you think new features that people might want to
experiment with but that are not yet ready for prime time should be
distributed -- branches are Not Great, as one has to keep rebasing
them)

zw

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-28 22:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-28 17:49 Joseph Myers
2017-09-28 22:01 ` Zack Weinberg [this message]
2017-09-28 22:38   ` Joseph Myers
2017-09-29 11:04   ` Florian Weimer
2017-09-30  6:35 ` Florian Weimer
2017-09-30 21:42   ` Joseph Myers
2017-10-05 10:39 ` Andreas K. Huettel
2017-10-05 11:07   ` Florian Weimer
2017-10-05 12:54     ` Joseph Myers
2017-10-05 13:16       ` libcidn (was: Re: Remove add-ons mechanism) Andreas K. Huettel
2017-10-05 13:39         ` libcidn Andreas Schwab
2017-10-05 13:40         ` libcidn Florian Weimer
2017-10-05 21:11       ` Remove add-ons mechanism Andreas K. Huettel
2017-10-05 21:30         ` Joseph Myers
2017-10-05 15:59 ` Joseph Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAKCAbMjrESb7_3=9ueuMKWeHwBJ9q_8_TdtojPejNPCr3JEUrw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=zackw@panix.com \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).