From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd41.google.com (mail-io1-xd41.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d41]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08C523857C62 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 22:00:11 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 08C523857C62 Received: by mail-io1-xd41.google.com with SMTP id r25so14881187ioj.0 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:00:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X2s8c9VSTxnLIpKBYFs3177jiVzGh2nPIHq9UYeJgkA=; b=lI/PeaSpXoDltULzgp5sqdqE6GFBrxI95mCmSrsjUnQH8+jT5P3mZrR4qGOkDe8ziR 5cFrjb+om2Y+M8SiCxRjnRqXv4eLxt8U/nE3zaYh70ZkRVsQVBnsnGO0ZnP8HnwJQ5Fx dhKaVmTM5wcXfyHAheFKnh823AV9ZoWW7F/U+v8F4HUcA4dIlAhpvx8BSkhCltEsSEXS 9aZ1+/ddLBIvQpcktxWUSrJU3mRuhrYlHOxIqS/M6LTJV4OtwOEYDlWG1g/JrwphEi7g wJ2lWKi1C/lYgt86yZ3eEj7i5SLOkHPzWkPDg+od6kx8V7bdP54A81K0c91w1R71xvtL /qHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533sf+18D8hagJsIhRUm2wQkvY5VPxOPhR+OTkkUeN8d34SFOcK4 GhsnqpSp2bAtEb+05VchcxxpswLIzgh4B5w0f1Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx5+YVB3wLYb/jmd+gNICy27IR9XK6IeR9EPJ+8zxxq1ihHpPW+UhwgQQ5Lnmzl3Jyu99ByHI9OwCb3jHpIQOg= X-Received: by 2002:a02:486:: with SMTP id 128mr7482050jab.8.1599948010570; Sat, 12 Sep 2020 15:00:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200907151057.196cdb1b@jawa> <0076afe3-0e43-a570-9358-9d00c88c0067@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Alistair Francis Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 14:49:06 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem with RISC-V To: Joseph Myers Cc: "H.J. Lu" , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Alistair Francis , GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, GIT_PATCH_0, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2020 22:00:12 -0000 On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 1:25 PM Joseph Myers wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020, Alistair Francis wrote: > > > > choices for RV32 that should be investigated. But when libgcc functions > > > reference libc functions, those generally need to be listed in > > > localplt.data for that glibc configuration (with a '?' to make the > > > reference optional, see e.g. the > > > sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/powerpc/powerpc32/nofpu/localplt.data entries for > > > > I sent a patch to do exactly that, but it was never accepted. Should I > > look at merging it? > > Yes. Ok. I bisected GCC, and apparently the bad commit is this: commit 68ec60c4a377b532ec2d265ea542107c36b1d15c (HEAD, tag: basepoints/gcc-10, refs/bisect/bad) Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Thu Apr 25 20:01:17 2019 +0200 * BASE-VER: Set to 10.0.0. From-SVN: r270581 diff --git a/gcc/BASE-VER b/gcc/BASE-VER index 37ad5c8b19d..a13e7b9c87e 100644 --- a/gcc/BASE-VER +++ b/gcc/BASE-VER @@ -1 +1 @@ -9.0.1 +10.0.0 diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog index 0682a44cd4a..fcdbfe4caec 100644 --- a/gcc/ChangeLog +++ b/gcc/ChangeLog @@ -1,3 +1,7 @@ +2019-04-25 Jakub Jelinek + + * BASE-VER: Set to 10.0.0. + 2019-04-25 Richard Biener PR middle-end/89765 I have no idea why though. Alistair > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > joseph@codesourcery.com