From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ua1-x942.google.com (mail-ua1-x942.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::942]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A92C395306F for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2020 22:24:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mail-ua1-x942.google.com with SMTP id t20so3948269uao.7 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:24:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=+L+viT0q6UPBFc0lm11TOufFtSmXhiZtCHCOPAI84j4=; b=K9WIpSB5jlXyyQY1pKYtGzSWy8Ra7+roWUo6rxZNob7u5IZcIecEX5IkhhDVkVsSPy j8jAeGahH/PSb0mosXILlK7j3j1+9wUTOA0a99n3boyi3GiKCh9wccRrMDrXK0At9lAZ Z/oB2g1i8UYteXKPlYBK2S2R13bIZUwYg6rtUZfqEqNIjzHvyCx0o5j8RQjlOtajWYLZ aVH+vcPJgDXrw7VAObFbpLdlnhVqhQTz3Lj0FlS/ujgRNycITaMnyyt/4ZsvDBD6SVgv M7pW8jz3qZme+3Dowwv7PRC83I83+R0H7w1xaXpZpG+VtXZdP3+G0qptvUDelKAzomGn e9ng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+L+viT0q6UPBFc0lm11TOufFtSmXhiZtCHCOPAI84j4=; b=O6/KHT4cq2uYwrEgWoU+DllfRGVbUnVHhpeDdvqdofQOPZAu/i3WBJK4zP3xK5TqUf /oj66AZZr30OQoC21ZmJ1jwDtCLKqUhn9Krlz4uqQUvpN2hKX5u3o/Zokgm+j7wsjG8T 2e7cIqa3jxtKJy/l8OefyNv+hK1IS/Wi1CZKJaPUXTKiwTyGeJbj/u9YQLJnkOa7cTLH 1n1dvPhvvFH9HGWEkegVa8bH7wcz6aWCHu5j0etnQJa1JZNC+bZtw4ciRpXuJPQUEd08 3vxtObBEa8UOVu2Xk1/yuPubZjIk3vfL5q2cQ8vfySm2lc+iCDyjusx+SJZU4vfDWtS+ gJMQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3WVt5+ozqqNRTBBsgpUrkyEzcxJdzU9kD9QLGEBTQ/piP8t8lg Il6iPh2OhiysD/ZbQTFxINncOb1mo3oGjOrPYdk= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vs/+SK+43f5SvKeBe074rhZrp24NLCEmevF6OH5ya3KA4oog8Ru1tF9e5d/oQemjoWmVDtmmln3hIZquqvVjvk= X-Received: by 2002:ab0:143:: with SMTP id 61mr10232773uak.85.1583792675214; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 15:24:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200303175355.15770-1-alistair.francis@wdc.com> <20200303175355.15770-2-alistair.francis@wdc.com> <20200305105110.602dc17d@jawa> In-Reply-To: From: Alistair Francis Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2020 15:16:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] sysv/linux: Rename alpha functions to be alpha specific To: Zack Weinberg Cc: Lukasz Majewski , Alistair Francis , GNU C Library , Adhemerval Zanella , Joseph Myers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 22:24:36 -0000 On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 1:38 PM Zack Weinberg wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 4:51 AM Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > > These functions are alpha specifc, rename them to be clear. > > > > > > Let's also rename the header file from tv32-compat.h to > > > alpha-tv32-compat.h. This is to avoid conflicts with the one we will > > > introduce later. > > > > Are there any more comments for this patch set from Alistair? Is it > > eligible for pulling? > > I don't have time to go over the whole patch set in detail this week, > but I see that it ends up removing alpha-tv32-compat.h by the end of > the series, so the specific concerns I had with earlier iterations > seem to be addressed. Ping! Am I ok to push this series? It's been reviewed and tested by Lukasz and no one else seems to have any complaints. Alistair > > zw