public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
	 "richard.henderson@linaro.org" <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] Makeconfig: Set pie-ccflag to -fPIE by default
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 12:02:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOoE1Fd0sO5foQcL3tehmsRPuC0XssamMdvTLzpQ3v6c6g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0801MB166829B54CB7FBF6AF83D6EF83759@AM5PR0801MB1668.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On Fri, Aug 26, 2022 at 11:39 AM Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
<libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> I recall that powerpc wanted to use -mcmodel=large, but it would require to
> >> adjust a lot of assembly implementations.  Are we sure this change does not
> >> trigger any regression with current glibc code?
>
> I don't see significant differences in terms of codesize on AArch64, so the patch
> is fine. As Richard mentioned, it often doesn't make any difference if a function
> only uses a single global.
>
> However this exposes a bug: it appears all symbols, including hidden symbols,
> are always accessed via the GOT in libc.a even when they don't in libc.so. As a
> result PIE code quality is actually worse than PIC... This affects libc_single_threaded

Is this issue processor specific?

> and many uses of internal arrays etc.
>
> So it looks like we should not ignore hidden when building for PIE.



-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-26 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-26 18:39 Wilco Dijkstra
2022-08-26 19:02 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2022-08-26 19:45   ` Richard Henderson
2022-08-26 20:11     ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-29 11:49       ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-08-29 13:10         ` Florian Weimer
2022-08-29 15:27           ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-08-29 15:27             ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-08-29 19:43             ` H.J. Lu
2022-08-29 19:57               ` Fangrui Song
2022-09-05  8:58                 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-09-15 21:45                   ` Fangrui Song
2022-09-20 13:59                     ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-09-20 14:12                       ` Florian Weimer
2022-09-20 16:00                         ` Wilco Dijkstra
2022-09-20 22:02                           ` Fangrui Song
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-08-25 21:01 Richard Henderson
2022-08-26 12:32 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2022-08-26 17:29   ` Richard Henderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMe9rOoE1Fd0sO5foQcL3tehmsRPuC0XssamMdvTLzpQ3v6c6g@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=richard.henderson@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).