From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Make libc symbols hidden in static PIE
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 07:39:25 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOof7O8B2Gk3i02ew8GHSO_dFfVW4P4Ogs1716k3OXgoPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210114111757.GA11466@arm.com>
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:18 AM Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@arm.com> wrote:
>
> The 01/13/2021 09:50, Szabolcs Nagy via Libc-alpha wrote:
> > The 01/12/2021 17:19, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 4:33 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 4:02 PM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > See:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14961
> > > > >
> > > > /* Mark all symbols hidden in static PIE libc to avoid GOT indirections. */
> > > > -#if BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && IS_IN (libc) && !defined LIBC_NONSHARED
> > > > +#if BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && !defined NO_HIDDEN_EXTERN_FUNC_IN_PIE \
> > > > + && IS_IN (libc) && !defined LIBC_NONSHARED
> > > > # pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
> > > > #endif
> > > >
> > >
> > > This works on i686.
>
> The series i plan to commit today is in nsz/bug27072 now,
>
> This is the v4 of this patch:
>
> Hidden matters with static PIE: extern symbol access in position
> independent code usually involves GOT indirections which needs
> RELATIVE relocs in a static linked PIE. Hidden visibility avoids
> indirections and RELATIVE relocs on targets that can access symbols
> pc-relative.
>
> The check should use IS_IN_LIB instead of IS_IN(libc) since all
> static libraries can use hidden visibility to avoid indirections,
> however the test system links objects from libcrypt.a into dynamic
> linked test binaries so hidden does not work there. I think mixing
> static and shared libc components in the same binary should not be
> supported usage, but to be safe only use hidden in libc.a.
>
> There are targets (i686) where hidden visibility functions are
> problematic in PIE code so hidden cannot be applied to all symbols.
> Then static PIE requires extern object access without relocations
> (e.g. by relying on copy relocations in shared libraries instead of
> GOT access in PIE code). See bug 14961.
>
> From -static-pie linked 'int main(){}' this shaves off 73 relative
> relocs on aarch64 and reduces code size too.
> ---
> include/libc-symbols.h | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/libc-symbols.h b/include/libc-symbols.h
> index ea126ae70c..f4dd735555 100644
> --- a/include/libc-symbols.h
> +++ b/include/libc-symbols.h
> @@ -434,13 +434,18 @@ for linking")
> strong_alias(real, name)
> #endif
>
> -#if defined SHARED || defined LIBC_NONSHARED \
> - || (BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && IS_IN (libc))
> +#if defined SHARED || defined LIBC_NONSHARED
> # define attribute_hidden __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden")))
> #else
> # define attribute_hidden
> #endif
>
> +/* Mark all symbols hidden in static PIE libc to avoid GOT indirections. */
> +#if BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && !defined NO_HIDDEN_EXTERN_FUNC_IN_PIE \
> + && IS_IN (libc) && !defined LIBC_NONSHARED
> +# pragma GCC visibility push(hidden)
> +#endif
> +
> #define attribute_tls_model_ie __attribute__ ((tls_model ("initial-exec")))
>
> #define attribute_relro __attribute__ ((section (".data.rel.ro")))
> --
> 2.17.1
>
This generates bad static PIE on i386. This patch is needed:
diff --git a/include/libc-symbols.h b/include/libc-symbols.h
index f4dd735555..72276a5c48 100644
--- a/include/libc-symbols.h
+++ b/include/libc-symbols.h
@@ -434,7 +434,9 @@ for linking")
strong_alias(real, name)
#endif
-#if defined SHARED || defined LIBC_NONSHARED
+#if defined SHARED || defined LIBC_NONSHARED \
+ || !defined NO_HIDDEN_EXTERN_FUNC_IN_PIE \
+ || (BUILD_PIE_DEFAULT && IS_IN (libc))
# define attribute_hidden __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden")))
#else
# define attribute_hidden
--
H.J.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-14 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-12 17:21 [PATCH v3 0/5] fix ifunc with static pie [BZ #27072] Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-12 17:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] configure: Require PI_STATIC_AND_HIDDEN for static pie Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-12 18:38 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-12 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] Make libc symbols hidden in static PIE Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-12 23:09 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-13 0:02 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-13 0:33 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-13 1:19 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-13 9:50 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-14 11:17 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-14 15:39 ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-01-15 3:36 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-15 4:29 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-15 11:25 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-15 13:43 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-15 14:27 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-15 15:28 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-15 22:42 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-16 0:41 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-16 13:18 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-18 16:22 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-12 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] elf: Make the tunable struct definition internal only Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-13 17:38 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-12 17:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] elf: Avoid RELATIVE relocs in __tunables_init Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-13 17:42 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-12 17:23 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] csu: Move static pie self relocation later [BZ #27072] Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-12 22:55 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-14 15:49 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-14 15:52 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-14 16:01 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-14 16:26 ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-14 17:19 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-14 17:59 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-01-14 17:05 ` Szabolcs Nagy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMe9rOof7O8B2Gk3i02ew8GHSO_dFfVW4P4Ogs1716k3OXgoPA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=szabolcs.nagy@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).