On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 7:04 AM Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Apr 30 2020, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 6:51 AM Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Apr 30 2020, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >>
> >> > * Andreas Schwab:
> >> >
> >> >> On Apr 30 2020, H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> diff --git a/include/sys/prctl.h b/include/sys/prctl.h
> >> >>> index 0920ed642b..1a74d83879 100644
> >> >>> --- a/include/sys/prctl.h
> >> >>> +++ b/include/sys/prctl.h
> >> >>> @@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
> >> >>>  # ifndef _ISOMAC
> >> >>>
> >> >>>  extern int __prctl (int __option, ...);
> >> >>> +libc_hidden_proto (__prctl)
> >> >>> +libc_hidden_proto (prctl)
> >> >>
> >> >> Why do you need the hidden alias for prctl?  All references inside
> >> >> libc.so should use __prctl.
> >> >
> >> > Right.  I want to clean this up in a separate patch.
> >>
> >> ??? Why adding it in the first place?
> >>
> >> Andreas.
> >>
> >
> > It was there before my patch:
>
> That doesn't matter, the syscall template adds it blindly to all names.
>
> Andreas.
>

Here is the updated patch without

libc_hidden_proto (prctl)

OK for master?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.