From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-oo1-xc34.google.com (mail-oo1-xc34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c34]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9DD03858001 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 18:28:52 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E9DD03858001 Received: by mail-oo1-xc34.google.com with SMTP id h10so623891ooi.10 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:28:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6JYYQUjSFhDHG2eRG6ZgMLAHsMgZGblE5jZYDtl7weM=; b=NX/EeFnehhrVSb9dFhFFrYiR0sjdK6TlQtCOWp2UrijhWSOBdEMudITRnXueHwkHNc H4StHIEHJX3eyrCqtUgygJQc0zIKBepR3EoR1AY8bIRuOV8+KNmP1CneiHIlto4dRkQp os8x5RiQdo6MU6DXr8rVfqX7KKlCvS3KaKoLbS7AyNfH8uZh0PZfkc+mF9qZ12d42LIF sdoKE1ixrf6NvepGbKBX3fb1cEg5JyDEu3juVun8z00Ttr9Jy+LoOJgv3mjiT4pHjmV6 OyBDxHwaVWG91pxx1bzDx+9O63M7di2IIYyI2dogsdrHQecpy2l3IBa7yJgaZA6k298g BG3A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53316b+tu0L4YhF7JNalHhqRBIlEULRfKiqkv+usT6rfbLRC6YGl +kJmRUnPOt8wDqpy2XB8lwBz20cDyMGuj/TsDkE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwViSB5/To6VHJiwylgea4dnSOECIjgxTADrID1DV0na2R+vygzzBChIKaES2zUsDgnWKnvKqr9rgnezlnZUA= X-Received: by 2002:a4a:d795:: with SMTP id c21mr2968316oou.57.1607538532237; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:28:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <011327e1-276d-7ea5-460e-7838f94ee4c9@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <011327e1-276d-7ea5-460e-7838f94ee4c9@gmail.com> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 10:28:16 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tests failing on x86_64-linux To: Martin Sebor Cc: GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3031.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 18:28:55 -0000 On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:17 AM Martin Sebor via Libc-alpha wrote: > > I've been seeing quite a few test failures in recent builds, more > than I used to in the past. Are those expected? I configure with > no options other than --prefix=/usr and after building without > installing (i.e., just make -j16) run make -j16 check. > > The results below are for the top of GCC/Glibc trunk on x86_64 > Fedora Linux but I don't think using GCC 10 improves things much > if at all. > "make check" is clean for me on Fedora 33/x86-64. Please make sure that you have all required packages installed, including libstdc++-static. -- H.J.