From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-75281-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 117475 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2016 21:32:24 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 117465 invoked by uid 89); 28 Nov 2016 21:32:23 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f181.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=mee11GnUmz1K3Yxmrk6/8/RN0UiAAdTxfX02Mz3Mwj4=;
        b=TLM6Uu4PucOdLNcYzTBTc+e54YkCVV8FoKpYcZWWTUo6/s/dCiXZ8CcyzoNeRrJQr/
         UwJmeVK+11oaJy24NCDSmScyJcruPQyDkVJyyVMH1pE2baAIhkiPFeED2KwtDdEcPjUj
         YpYgZKLcBG8ACyCnzbD4wQnBOSB+76JFEEr7qkQf9E7uV1lU3nuiE5e0kflMXssyLy43
         k+VVtALp+6wRXitDSMkCGMB+W+pQfubgJWPaJeTZ5ZApx4icgToKfLaAzAmyhFNTCUeq
         rkvuDeaj/eZInyIA929BcYYS3sMQ1SWi8eoNZhxc/LTbxrP8+3zMa+tU6kFo52TzgLWB
         RNKA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC006k3+FdUqPuBxUALCHcGNkqW18XTVcvIo9Pb7UFpApz8IMa6Waq1/gp2d4PPTBF1k1lVSSrc7saPrL7w==
X-Received: by 10.55.12.19 with SMTP id 19mr23068077qkm.100.1480368731950;
 Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:32:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611281825510.19633@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
References: <20161104174739.GA5880@intel.com> <f3a3acd2-044a-c4bf-11e4-ecee4caf5324@redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOrBerHaGT4M00nnyayQZsD41b+SPateKMOdfHZE5dF11Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1129b1b2-5f7a-26c3-76a7-727a14fdadfb@redhat.com> <CAMe9rOqWq--vo3T8NhEpFGuyA7Z8hHVN_DK6g8rauVaxYKZ+ig@mail.gmail.com>
 <c4cea244-e116-8eb5-0341-8f2a9e559b2a@archlinux.org> <9fec617f-752d-2818-e193-16be4e1de875@redhat.com>
 <CAMe9rOpcyETFMbJrDu2PontwYnyKX9Q+4jUj-BrATDFp_p7K8A@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611281825510.19633@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 21:32:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpF-L+Y0qZpN0LmuWi5DupC5CT77oiTrtSfeY0+LtxtsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Don't use PLT nor GOT in libc.a [BZ #20750]
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>, Allan McRae <allan@archlinux.org>, 
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg01034.txt.bz2

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Does this fix bug 20621 or not?  (At one point 20621 and 20750 were marked
> as duplicates.)
>

Bug 20621 compiles glibc with -fPIC -DPIC.  I don't think it is the
supported way to build glibc.


-- 
H.J.