public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>,
	"Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	 GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ld.so: Handle read-only dynamic section gracefully [BZ #28340]
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:14:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpQHzBXZr6Ee1yQjPMWrFznHZYqznwxZZH0pBHsAxTKzw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874kakjt2p.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:04 AM Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> * H. J. Lu:
>
> > No.  Relocation of vDSO dynamic section is done by elf_get_dynamic_info.
> > Here is a patch to remove the hack for vDSO.
>
> I have concerns that this does not actually work on MIPS.  What happens
> if the object has a single RWX LOAD segment?  What kind of flags will
> the link editor set on the DYNAMIC segment in this case?  RWX or R, RX?
> I suspect it will be RWX, which means that we actually need the special
> case.
>

My patch should handle it in ld.so properly.  Non-glibc consumers of
PT_DYNAMIC segment need to handle it differently for these non-ABI
conforming binaries.

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-16 22:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-14 19:09 Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-14 19:15 ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-15  1:14   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-15 14:35 ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-15 15:42   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-15 16:13     ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-15 16:24       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-15 16:34         ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-16  1:43           ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-16  2:23             ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-16  3:46               ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-16  4:26                 ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-16  4:28                   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-16  4:30                     ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-16  4:48               ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-16  5:36                 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-16  5:46                   ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-16  6:04                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-16 14:11                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-09-16 15:18                   ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-16 16:45                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-16 17:38                       ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-16 17:58                         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-16 22:11                           ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-17  2:47                             ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-17  2:59                               ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-17  3:36                                 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-17  3:42                                   ` H.J. Lu
2021-09-17  3:44                                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-17  3:44                                   ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-17  3:51                                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-16 18:03                         ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-16 22:14                           ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-09-17  2:58                           ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-17  3:46                             ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-17  4:00                               ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-17  4:12                                 ` [PATCH] ld.so: Remove DL_RO_DYN_SECTION H.J. Lu
2021-09-17  6:54                                   ` David Abdurachmanov
2021-09-17  9:01                                   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2021-09-17 15:40                                     ` H.J. Lu
2021-10-14 12:36                               ` [PATCH] ld.so: Handle read-only dynamic section gracefully [BZ #28340] Maciej W. Rozycki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMe9rOpQHzBXZr6Ee1yQjPMWrFznHZYqznwxZZH0pBHsAxTKzw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=siddhesh@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).