public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho <tuliom@ascii.art.br>
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>,
	"Lucas A. M. Magalhaes" <lamm@linux.ibm.com>,
	 GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] Fix time/tst-cpuclock1 intermitent failures
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:31:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOpdodSJbp9uBHhe+YLuV_Gzh=GFGwdEKos1SvNWMePh2Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOp9G3zXL+6YYvQR2C7Kx9TsWTQ_DYgO4ZDUi0jN5DB91Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 7:45 AM H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:10 PM Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
> <tuliom@ascii.art.br> wrote:
> >
> > Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> writes:
> >
> > > OK for master. I'd like to see this fixed in glibc 2.32.
> > > Thank you for fixing the test case!
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
> >
> > Pushed as 04deeaa9ea74b0679dfc9d9155a37b6425f19a9f.
> >
>
> support/tst-timespec failed on i686 and x32:
>
> Test case 10
> tst-timespec.c:312: numeric comparison failure
>    left: 0 (0x0); from: support_timespec_check_in_range
> (check_cases[i].expected, check_cases[i].observed,
> check_cases[i].lower_bound, check_cases[i].upper_bound)
>   right: 1 (0x1); from: check_cases[i].result
> Test case 11
>

Usage of long may be the problem.

-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-07-11 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-06 14:48 [PATCH v2] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-02-17 16:44 ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-02-18 12:44 ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-02-19 16:42   ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-02-19 18:51     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2020-02-20 18:17 ` [PATCH v3] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-04 19:24   ` Matheus Castanho
2020-03-06 17:31     ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-10 16:20   ` [PATCH v4] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-10 16:30     ` Andreas Schwab
2020-03-10 17:45     ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-03-23 17:20     ` [PATCH v5] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-23 21:06       ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-03-24 19:42         ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-31 18:55           ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-03-31 11:34       ` [PATCH v6] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-03-31 19:02         ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-04-03 19:24         ` [PATCH v7] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-04-03 20:48           ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-04-07 13:59           ` [PATCH v8] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-04-16 17:30             ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-04-16 19:21             ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-04-21 17:44             ` [PATCH v9] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-05-11 17:41               ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-05-25 11:46                 ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-06-08 13:58                   ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-06-08 16:52               ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-06-12 15:28               ` [PATCH v10] " Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-06-25 17:26                 ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-07-06 14:15                   ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes
2020-07-07 20:12                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-07-10 23:07                   ` Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho
2020-07-11 14:45                     ` H.J. Lu
2020-07-11 16:31                       ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2020-07-13 23:30                         ` [PATCH] Correct timespec implementation [BZ #26232] H.J. Lu
2020-07-14  2:35                           ` Carlos O'Donell
2020-07-14 11:16                           ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-14 11:42                             ` H.J. Lu
2020-07-14 12:04                               ` H.J. Lu
2020-07-14 12:18                                 ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-14 13:12                                   ` H.J. Lu
2020-07-14 13:14                                     ` Florian Weimer
2020-07-14 13:17                                       ` H.J. Lu
2020-07-15 19:38                                         ` Paul Eggert
2020-07-15 19:44                                           ` H.J. Lu
2020-07-14 13:08                               ` Lucas A. M. Magalhaes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMe9rOpdodSJbp9uBHhe+YLuV_Gzh=GFGwdEKos1SvNWMePh2Q@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=lamm@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=tuliom@ascii.art.br \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).