From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io1-xd42.google.com (mail-io1-xd42.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d42]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3C993857C40 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 16:32:30 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org C3C993857C40 Received: by mail-io1-xd42.google.com with SMTP id i4so9155521iov.11 for ; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:32:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=N94BWyxahfK/RpWcW/JufK3c97NWg2pdDDweOTWl+T4=; b=qJt2av9UmwK1MBIGijrWaJBAGM40m0CmE8FDwxCfMznf0FsYZVKxr2JAJucYh5GZuO gh4bCWTvGsAWDse8ZjoXlSq8P2eRSG6M6/ra+f5T0SmvIM6+tcoX4h+gA3lH0UpVkVuF snqM229wfiyt8f/4aWXU+55uOLiPN1slL47MxlliK4D4nidShklhYqnRV5VSLqzpDUPz 3ZvEHen/WHeNje7y9/Ywx8LdwNh/OqYMIoL7vHdelt+19Xh99PuTI7Y6tJHmPgjfNt4I TdRCmPpHInzyLp5i96pJUPK2xtZs8yU5lHee720jf5ALvyHKtOFbDh67AigoqGAr9dm4 +1bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530iCBTac9DA0WIX2sBTWD8RYNcAKmlRp4j96FcyjGqkKXsRxf9Q hBMx9suUTPycg2dTdFd+foAoRHlWh6aoXvScAfXeYw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJybWzvH/vjMh34spF0fgX5JL2DGuvdbAqcVHYeISFUjHwtnPtrFqKbLEhppBNAvsFi4BBdPexteSn7nWFkqwC8= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:bf85:: with SMTP id p127mr53359235iof.37.1594485150305; Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:32:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200421174456.28663-1-lamm@linux.ibm.com> <20200612152817.1347220-1-lamm@linux.ibm.com> <875zavezq6.fsf@linux.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 09:31:54 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] Fix time/tst-cpuclock1 intermitent failures To: Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" , "Lucas A. M. Magalhaes" , GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 16:32:31 -0000 On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 7:45 AM H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 4:10 PM Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho > wrote: > > > > Carlos O'Donell via Libc-alpha writes: > > > > > OK for master. I'd like to see this fixed in glibc 2.32. > > > Thank you for fixing the test case! > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Carlos O'Donell > > > > Pushed as 04deeaa9ea74b0679dfc9d9155a37b6425f19a9f. > > > > support/tst-timespec failed on i686 and x32: > > Test case 10 > tst-timespec.c:312: numeric comparison failure > left: 0 (0x0); from: support_timespec_check_in_range > (check_cases[i].expected, check_cases[i].observed, > check_cases[i].lower_bound, check_cases[i].upper_bound) > right: 1 (0x1); from: check_cases[i].result > Test case 11 > Usage of long may be the problem. -- H.J.