On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, H.J. Lu wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 20 Aug 2017, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> >
>> >> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ do_test (void)
>> >>
>> >>             if (STRLEN (&adr[outer]) != (size_t) (inner - outer))
>> >>               {
>> >> -               printf ("%s flunked for outer = %d, inner = %d\n",
>> >> +               printf ("%s flunked for outer = %Zd, inner = %Zd\n",
>> >
>> > I don't think we should be using legacy %Z in any new code.  Use C99 %zu
>> > for size_t (%zd only if the argument is the corresponding signed type
>> > rather than size_t itself).
>> >
>>
>> There are some %Zd in string/stratcliff.c.  Should they be changed?
>> Since All of them are size_t, I will replace %Zd with %zu.
>
> In my view it makes sense to clean up existing uses of %Z legacy formats,
> provided there is still stdio test coverage that %Z behaves as expected.
>

Here is the updated patch.  OK for master?

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.