From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3953385041D for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 21:45:33 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org F3953385041D Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id y24so2919542otk.3 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:45:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VxtpIMbIwpJX8ac4Sf0q26hzPl2/SYYIEgXC3JaiiB4=; b=fPApcE6VDTdoGwtWdrCwHnbwmzz9LwQYqSD3Ky887lnbqcWcj7Q598M7BI18XZ+Hn5 7lveHdP2iKzrjfEX4lks4BQv9KazWnz+j46Ioha9VYp/QXb928tbuQgTEKeHpREzZWwn pMt3PEj+9P4gmYDEbTpNJ1v6Y7OjLOPj7mW8CVIayAOr39xrOOGB0YPwxjrjii6qNoqr Hz0eXrNPeuJLJwH+/bdW6v3Pt9P4KpGV4Q5V9kBF8KhlLGK/2F+miAPHrAO8P8wVIwxR hfeURcgzxWgMYNT2a9h0tSappP9rc31XOQsQdCWrdeRc5iUJl/Tl1cZYjiV/KDqKjLmi 2tvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533mFCBhz4sShbp/4BfdeHx/q/7T8gCJqxUydxpMqatZQncSdo79 iRzlSzys07etvHvhsMfyxBGnS1/YW//fIe0XgTo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyimrm5QAtBNLIL7pWTlZaiJYg4PwGrU2gl1ykAzGOC+hjeftPeyDmcVTIWZXiArgQ1D3RDnkJ6zUz2k+thp2g= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1d71:: with SMTP id l17mr3586704oti.269.1607550333335; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 13:45:33 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <011327e1-276d-7ea5-460e-7838f94ee4c9@gmail.com> <7805b6dd-14b0-d014-cf1d-6e2d6e1cfb74@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <7805b6dd-14b0-d014-cf1d-6e2d6e1cfb74@gmail.com> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 13:44:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: tests failing on x86_64-linux To: Martin Sebor Cc: Florian Weimer , GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3032.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, KAM_SHORT, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 21:45:35 -0000 On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:17 PM Martin Sebor wrote: > > On 12/9/20 11:28 AM, H.J. Lu wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:17 AM Martin Sebor via Libc-alpha > > wrote: > >> > >> I've been seeing quite a few test failures in recent builds, more > >> than I used to in the past. Are those expected? I configure with > >> no options other than --prefix=/usr and after building without > >> installing (i.e., just make -j16) run make -j16 check. > >> > >> The results below are for the top of GCC/Glibc trunk on x86_64 > >> Fedora Linux but I don't think using GCC 10 improves things much > >> if at all. > >> > > > > "make check" is clean for me on Fedora 33/x86-64. Please make sure that > > you have all required packages installed, including libstdc++-static. > > > > It's been a while since I built Glibc with the system compiler > so I must have misremembered the results. Here they are for > my Fedora 29 machine (with libstdc++-static installed and with > --prefix=/usr): > > gcc version 8.3.1 20190223 (Red Hat 8.3.1-2) (GCC) > > UNSUPPORTED: assert/tst-assert-c++ > UNSUPPORTED: assert/tst-assert-g++ > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-chk4 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-chk5 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-chk6 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-lfschk4 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-lfschk5 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-lfschk6 > UNSUPPORTED: dlfcn/bug-atexit3 > UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-audit10 > UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-avx512 > UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-env-setuid > UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-env-setuid-tunables > XPASS: elf/tst-protected1a > XPASS: elf/tst-protected1b > UNSUPPORTED: math/test-double-libmvec-sincos-avx512 > UNSUPPORTED: math/test-float-libmvec-sincosf-avx512 > UNSUPPORTED: misc/tst-pkey > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-cancel24 > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-cancel24-static > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-minstack-throw > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-once5 > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-thread_local1 > UNSUPPORTED: stdlib/tst-quick_exit > UNSUPPORTED: stdlib/tst-thread-quick_exit > Summary of test results: > 4214 PASS > 24 UNSUPPORTED > 16 XFAIL > 2 XPASS > > And below are the results I see with today's top of GCC trunk. > All the failures are due to "original exit status 127" which IIUC > means the program wasn't found. Yet they're all there. Could it > have something to do with the paralellization? The other > difference between the native build and my GCC 11 build is that > the latter is an unoptimized GCC so it takes quite a bit longer > to compile. > > gcc version 11.0.0 20201209 (experimental) (GCC) Did you apply https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561332.html > UNSUPPORTED: assert/tst-assert-c++ > UNSUPPORTED: assert/tst-assert-g++ > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-chk4 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-chk5 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-chk6 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-lfschk4 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-lfschk5 > UNSUPPORTED: debug/tst-lfschk6 > UNSUPPORTED: dlfcn/bug-atexit3 > UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-audit10 > UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-avx512 > FAIL: elf/tst-dlopen-self-container > FAIL: elf/tst-dlopen-tlsmodid-container > UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-env-setuid > UNSUPPORTED: elf/tst-env-setuid-tunables > FAIL: elf/tst-glibc-hwcaps-cache > FAIL: elf/tst-glibc-hwcaps-prepend-cache > FAIL: elf/tst-ldconfig-bad-aux-cache > FAIL: elf/tst-ldconfig-ld_so_conf-update > FAIL: elf/tst-pldd > XPASS: elf/tst-protected1a > XPASS: elf/tst-protected1b > FAIL: locale/tst-localedef-path-norm > FAIL: localedata/tst-localedef-hardlinks > UNSUPPORTED: math/test-double-libmvec-sincos-avx512 > UNSUPPORTED: math/test-float-libmvec-sincosf-avx512 > UNSUPPORTED: misc/tst-pkey > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-cancel24 > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-cancel24-static > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-minstack-throw > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-once5 > FAIL: nptl/tst-pthread-getattr > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber > UNSUPPORTED: nptl/tst-thread_local1 > FAIL: nss/tst-nss-db-endgrent > FAIL: nss/tst-nss-db-endpwent > FAIL: nss/tst-nss-files-hosts-long > FAIL: nss/tst-nss-test3 > FAIL: nss/tst-reload1 > FAIL: posix/bug-ga2 > UNSUPPORTED: posix/bug-ga2-mem > UNSUPPORTED: resolv/mtrace-tst-leaks2 > FAIL: resolv/tst-leaks2 > UNSUPPORTED: stdlib/tst-quick_exit > FAIL: stdlib/tst-system > UNSUPPORTED: stdlib/tst-thread-quick_exit > FAIL: string/tst-strerror > FAIL: string/tst-strsignal > Summary of test results: > 20 FAIL > 4192 PASS > 26 UNSUPPORTED > 16 XFAIL > 2 XPASS > > Martin -- H.J.