From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-82340-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 102517 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2017 23:35:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 102498 invoked by uid 89); 21 Jul 2017 23:35:40 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-24.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,GIT_PATCH_0,GIT_PATCH_1,GIT_PATCH_2,GIT_PATCH_3,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f49.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=wzMJ2CAi/pFZKH8gzTe9TyaATcF4wJSiBZjeIdf6/Jg=;
        b=qVlhtP2Bl6YJPdqrWjEaaoGKQKZm6Y2q37vF/PC/2caiGzE+8ec3RhrfLzwLlTF1fX
         2JlH2BEq3jfSvzaBLgtYms0/XenbkK0PtxrGu4ro00Vz6SOi0eBikgxn4r59BmQqL7Lc
         CbZkgo+/n9JNoTyTMNiPgpKujeKojB/HKmNUWKfeawJRY6hrCnv8IgOIOvuu3VwUVV1N
         jze0h1qImNdzk0JOcFP6Ijj9af+00oYOYFZ59RcPRsGUKujBoJwGVv0aaBrd45JCywTt
         ECnm7GPONO/9HHg1tcbomYnyqnzOXn2EkqZJ1iLFIblYC3mTvTWjMCGKRKgYVCOth3EP
         tC+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113r/9QKH/fXmUKlxpLtGnH54luHCnwran3z8FkE3fUf136MhmUo
	TnJdyfao4UPfhSg0eDpGk0sVfS4j8g==
X-Received: by 10.202.219.198 with SMTP id s189mr3422514oig.103.1500680137464;
 Fri, 21 Jul 2017 16:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <xnbmodtlvx.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
References: <20170721231747.GA19787@gmail.com> <xnbmodtlvx.fsf@greed.delorie.com>
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2017 23:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqB5op3b_=+2n3BsEMxUErOVuhYZZ+RazcqutZoQRVsQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Fix nss/nss_test1.c compile with latest GCC
To: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
Cc: sellcey@cavium.com, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2017-07/txt/msg00784.txt.bz2

On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:23 PM, DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> I think the right solution is to fix test5.  I suspect that leaving in
> "bad" default data is a good test for a properly configured test,a and
> we might want to add some "bad" default group data as well.
>
> diff --git a/nss/tst-nss-test5.c b/nss/tst-nss-test5.c
> index b70f21e..fef41f0 100644
> --- a/nss/tst-nss-test5.c
> +++ b/nss/tst-nss-test5.c
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ do_test (void)
>    int i;
>    struct passwd *p;
>
> -  __nss_configure_lookup ("passwd", "test1 test2");
> +  __nss_configure_lookup ("passwd", "test1");
>
>    setpwent ();
>

Works for me.  Can you check it in?

Thanks.

-- 
H.J.