From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-69100-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 74687 invoked by alias); 23 Apr 2016 12:57:27 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 74666 invoked by uid 89); 23 Apr 2016 12:57:27 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f171.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc;
        bh=95j3XRtHvxJ6JMnnayJViIItUBNPXQQj0bEmTgebmsE=;
        b=h0SlyzbTuJ/9RHktSumviqUaJy4FkKYx4thnAxSD66Imcq18XRhyOnzb1IFix5cnJI
         tq2HsdrhI94b2uhM+KQKrSY5YMPT3+0M/BwFsTUjnyKoCZK07EIRr1PVXI8tLPHsgrhQ
         pSmw54OTyRZixQXU5Bw3naXZI6VxBsMLZuM8eXWQe6t0LAv0QJ63tRGQzJbkqH4zmJWl
         H68bByamp+MGkDffbt3JspCkcuJFPXI/QMqqj+CIzeyV0HCkrD+i3+seIGTa6pWrerhq
         Ku/woO2N6RIi4N4+4GH6gCnCcbBAjKjDBRru3Kt+NPxGjJPApRXTgQ2AkLbbu8o8ulXh
         JugQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FUbbYwt7E7SmGaWWCILB3ndRrl3KEIAi7aN3Am3E+Z1PxqM86SLA5u0rhRjf/GZ/nd7ZhcGjqeLtZwItw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.20.83 with SMTP id e80mr9244955qkh.196.1461416234936;
 Sat, 23 Apr 2016 05:57:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAMe9rOokJmM5o2O5H+DapcYhqyhnAV24r0uRmB71+f-sYQVc4Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160402153421.GA28788@intel.com>
	<20160402173308.GU6588@vapier.lan>
	<CAMe9rOq8ZsUUKJRuuwL0hvHtjm1Swx1x5H_GjbzR54HU+VzK9g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAMe9rOoD2MjeFks+869r7v8S5S07eArBh3p57MBmYxbV7HK6UQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<m2zitb2nbd.fsf@linux-m68k.org>
	<CAMe9rOokJmM5o2O5H+DapcYhqyhnAV24r0uRmB71+f-sYQVc4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 12:57:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqJZEY=i+wW5w_Yom6m9W7jRQk3qr_2kiZ6+FZMqzrafA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reduce number of mmap calls from __libc_memalign in ld.so
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00586.txt.bz2

On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 6:42 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> +      if (__glibc_unlikely (nup == 0 && n))
>>
>> Please also fix the implicit boolean coercion.
>>
>> Andreas.
>>
>
> Like this?  OK for master?
>

I am checking it now.


-- 
H.J.