From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17887 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2017 13:51:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 17529 invoked by uid 89); 21 Aug 2017 13:51:32 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS,URIBL_RED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=Hx-languages-length:722 X-HELO: mail-oi0-f46.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ehncWXQlteZgjviu15W5GHjH5zoRKjVnruE5Wc1wLNU=; b=ZkB4YBz6LOQzhIWtmOVAaGM0HnpYZAchqEecJ99uMjb1q5NRNpvAoXv/247XfeW0ZX NtQOMenlITWUlSjdNXEwhmYWek98Xycr2kw2wyKWh3rpCRHUAJdVYWiLf1FS7ZB7/SPn VpxoVc7TbYYJs6M80rINmbG8fu8TFTktxadHiRV4Gq7FkQAonmHvwVG7JNgpiQ6pSQkX c5mhUpGGLFbxLt7681CQo0FMAmkw126fUgYr6/tg1zVZBw6hCMtdc1OE9jbVBy8H7xDg TxkztU/JpzjXIJlWF/Zxv0YOnEVkGQ7E329jfd0Dqm+HNhRfPT7JkOw/t7okxjs8gldL M73Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5j/4homTw2XQMibCZTaKkxL+r2k8uml3LM6+fNSQNVbb7nr1rl1 yJpWGrSXPht4G2RcT4xOqeM0NNPwlsrV X-Received: by 10.202.192.84 with SMTP id q81mr24189547oif.88.1503323489093; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 06:51:29 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170820171713.GA19531@gmail.com> From: "H.J. Lu" Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 13:51:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] string/stratcliff.c: Replace int with size_t [BZ #21982] To: Joseph Myers Cc: GNU C Library Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2017-08/txt/msg00978.txt.bz2 On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Sun, 20 Aug 2017, H.J. Lu wrote: > >> @@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ do_test (void) >> >> if (STRLEN (&adr[outer]) != (size_t) (inner - outer)) >> { >> - printf ("%s flunked for outer = %d, inner = %d\n", >> + printf ("%s flunked for outer = %Zd, inner = %Zd\n", > > I don't think we should be using legacy %Z in any new code. Use C99 %zu > for size_t (%zd only if the argument is the corresponding signed type > rather than size_t itself). > There are some %Zd in string/stratcliff.c. Should they be changed? Since All of them are size_t, I will replace %Zd with %zu. -- H.J.