public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: "H.J. Lu via Libc-alpha" <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ldconfig/x86: Store ISA level in cache and aux cache
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:43:35 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOqu8j+yiYKM9miSSsnaYXx1DvB8kQ_RYO2wTvuUS9ay_A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87im7g24qt.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:20 PM Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> * H. J. Lu via Libc-alpha:
>
> > Subject: [PATCH] ldconfig/x86: Store ISA level in cache and aux cache
> >
> > Store ISA level in the portion of the unused upper 32 bits of the hwcaps
> > field in cache and the unused pad field in aux cache.  ISA level is stored
> > and checked only for shared objects in glibc-hwcaps subdirectories.  The
> > shared objects in the default directories aren't checked since there are
> > no fallbacks for these shared objects.
>
> Why is it necessary to duplicate the ISA levels in the cache when they
> are implied by the subdirectory name?
>
> I would have expected to store the ISA levels in the cache for DSOs
> *not* in glibc-hwcaps subdirectories.  The redundancy does not make
> sense to me.
>
> ldconfig checking for matches between ISA levels and subdirectory names
> makes sense too.
>

A v4 DSO may be placed in v2 subdirectory by mistake.


-- 
H.J.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-28 20:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-06 14:49 V5 [PATCH 0/2] x86: Support GNU_PROPERTY_X86_ISA_1_NEEDED marker [BZ #26717] H.J. Lu
2020-12-06 14:49 ` V5 [PATCH 1/2] x86: Support GNU_PROPERTY_X86_ISA_1_V[234] " H.J. Lu
2021-01-06 12:00   ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-06 17:11     ` V6 " H.J. Lu
2021-01-07 20:09       ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-07 20:58         ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-18 11:17           ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-18 13:49             ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-18 15:15               ` Florian Weimer
2020-12-06 14:49 ` V5 [PATCH 2/2] ldconfig/x86: Add ISA level check to glibc-hwcaps H.J. Lu
2020-12-07 10:00   ` Florian Weimer
2020-12-08 13:25     ` H.J. Lu
2020-12-08 13:31       ` Florian Weimer
2020-12-08 14:10         ` H.J. Lu
2020-12-08 14:18           ` Florian Weimer
2020-12-08 14:23             ` H.J. Lu
2020-12-08 15:15               ` Florian Weimer
2020-12-08 15:31                 ` H.J. Lu
2020-12-09  3:27                   ` [PATCH] ldconfig/x86: Store ISA level in cache and aux cache H.J. Lu
2021-01-12 16:25                     ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-12 23:32                       ` V2 " H.J. Lu
2021-01-13 13:47                         ` Adhemerval Zanella
2021-01-13 14:12                           ` H.J. Lu
2021-01-28 20:20                     ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-28 20:43                       ` H.J. Lu [this message]
2021-01-29  8:56                         ` Florian Weimer
2021-01-29 12:44                           ` H.J. Lu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMe9rOqu8j+yiYKM9miSSsnaYXx1DvB8kQ_RYO2wTvuUS9ay_A@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=hjl.tools@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).