From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-79713-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 43274 invoked by alias); 24 May 2017 21:36:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 43204 invoked by uid 89); 24 May 2017 21:36:49 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=
X-HELO: mail-qt0-f170.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=TTITnfr14uUyeX1EqyWs8gJuwda78ksxCy5PoMSlOkc=;
        b=hTVE0wFjejM1BRu6R25tjI+JgURBobJsve6WcW3EpH3yVQJAbN2Bs34o3J3GRaE2aO
         pBLtiJiDthBacNkkzgLI7B9Sw0rX402bXoQh+4WwWzAn25XaXV1PqUkGA/m2SiuYMMuW
         kPjqaBticKPRi/kqAL6nVzUhb/8YHvdGc45uVr6sdJTPpxT0/nUvP0YSLcuVUqosLLnu
         7wvIEorIW4UoXKk2e3ewNhjUeVXQDcymS1+8OfTdn/TjSsz3akMwSr6cgsBdaqpj6xam
         g1k/KHEBdli8p5jCobJN7YeLOeM4yVd+zBnA1zL2sk/GO0+gABssAsuN83r6X8TZM9pA
         ZDCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCTxlb2/B3DkJvWTRxdKgsqow54wdytXcEOltfYcbevlp133reR
	ry9X/oLPXpc4EzKO0yR3fqjz8M9HKg==
X-Received: by 10.200.53.187 with SMTP id k56mr40283759qtb.104.1495661810109;
 Wed, 24 May 2017 14:36:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOVZoAM8iAhH__mtm+HUZb8N6OXk1P=9QKgFeewtmStmXzVSMg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOVZoAPo-A5-bRZFHeu_wvTASzh_4nYwmqfCVfHQ7h34GyWKAA@mail.gmail.com>
 <9c563a4b-424b-242f-b82f-4650ab2637f7@redhat.com> <CAOVZoAO9Ryz0uqGx4aXi+vf27c_+j8e+_opxcfQK27qO0OnBpw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOo8SbuodNhZugDLhdRPU=8OZuKVp4eT+3-6Gw-K0OLs3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOVZoAMmOoPU2ECGGiM6=tXdNXmd6HhKEqu67dP3u_WZ5gfm3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOr-E6OsDYsUCc7ci54e9R7A+BjH82eiMvLydtiJD61uzw@mail.gmail.com>
 <28e34264-e8c5-5570-c48c-9125893808b2@redhat.com> <CAOVZoAPp3_T+ourRkNFXHfCSQUOMFn4iBBm9j50==h=VJcGSzw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOpi75y5ATt8bUYSB6LJexQNfOXbOb=gYdMG3d3g4P6U9Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOrznBXKWHL5bOUSs75A96j_5jiHF+W+D-U3tusYpbwp0Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOVZoANj7Oqu66oXcfn-Fmi5UHVaxBRd-bkxVbaSr3bWUPXaXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOpO_q8hMt+U4xUB8HoR9i7E0LO92SCiU_=v_306XdtjJQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOVZoAOWzf0U7T-1Gbf7YUOfz4+X4frE+y1OHbSuQ-_Ta1uX2w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOowieroCST=wq81Co+OHud81jyjJZ8OZpqQCmEnnoPZfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOVZoAM8iAhH__mtm+HUZb8N6OXk1P=9QKgFeewtmStmXzVSMg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 21:36:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOr3sYTd31vtmvBQzTC_JribPpf6gDZn6ZotwW+XqO8YhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: memcpy performance regressions 2.19 -> 2.24(5)
To: Erich Elsen <eriche@google.com>
Cc: "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>, GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00741.txt.bz2

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Erich Elsen <eriche@google.com> wrote:
> Here is the patch that slightly refactors how init_cacheinfo is called.
>

Please take a look at hjl/tunables/master branch.  You can add
non_temporal_threshold support on top of it.


-- 
H.J.