From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-79275-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 62087 invoked by alias); 11 May 2017 14:45:57 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 61825 invoked by uid 89); 11 May 2017 14:45:43 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=integrating
X-HELO: mail-qk0-f170.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=kY+3bSj9C3F6bod0c2t93YplmKugGR5JI2aOkP/Fl70=;
        b=MyNpjhR+fuuEKlPruqGat+QvMEDD8B1v3JvnQ/lgU+88xRsXXfn0MKH6y/4/e8a7ip
         nWURPJ351jcuBh1wEKcOVljdtgxerorNOr8LFXLL4kSReUXXr7idahI/u+vehP8VzklD
         SOzJkzmbllf1DXXsLywoN4GSRssP1Cm8nT7SX68g/+eaH1tat2Ac3qDc5bfeRuscy8jQ
         w9Y9EdxTAiz0+0F9hVr+GGMPRay53LhmWI0uj6SY4FwprUJNPycQJXvvTIcAfjoKyI46
         zfJO8T3BiFi/OqgWUwuA1VlANjLYhNSAvGcdScpv/hKejkXF1plBMqLznQhCWSG4zmYf
         Eq8Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDaUvDbtibT8SIZJIIFRLpHL/sAIT14fo2rtr8qKKFqqBV1BqHy
	ugN2gSClA0nLZhSc4BiXwQKHQTnCLw==
X-Received: by 10.55.162.136 with SMTP id l130mr736049qke.275.1494513939173;
 Thu, 11 May 2017 07:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKCAbMiFkSwRc3Tdohina+0CpP3Sqwyo=jGf80Y=iUfZRzWHxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20170511141836.GB26086@intel.com> <CAKCAbMgOB5eNNgoWjkMM-GHVxgfVs307mZRYvvXZ35gUgDuOXA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMe9rOo8Y8+hm8KNS3sQX_q_qtM8stWbdad9yO5c1nX1w0ag2Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAKCAbMiFkSwRc3Tdohina+0CpP3Sqwyo=jGf80Y=iUfZRzWHxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 14:45:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAMe9rOrx8O=nTw22hZBKCwFNP56exO3MtAeAuqK-YWXYms2nGw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add __BEGIN_DECLS and __END_DECLS for C++
To: Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-SW-Source: 2017-05/txt/msg00303.txt.bz2

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:43 AM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:39 AM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Zack Weinberg <zackw@panix.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:18 AM, H.J. Lu <hongjiu.lu@intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Add __BEGIN_DECLS and __END_DECLS to support C++.
>>>>
>>>> Any comments?
>>>
>>> Could you please explain why you found this to be necessary?
>>> ifunc-impl-list.h is an internal header which should never be compiled
>>> as C++ in the first place.
>>
>> I am integrating memcpy_benchmark.cc:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/ekelsen/b66cc085eb39f0495b57679cdb1874fa
>>
>> into glibc benchtests.  It is a C++ program.
>
> This program does not appear to need ifunc-impl-list.h.  Please elaborate.
>

Please see hjl/x86/optimize branch in glibc git repo.

-- 
H.J.