From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-76269-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 13472 invoked by alias); 22 Dec 2016 23:40:13 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 13455 invoked by uid 89); 22 Dec 2016 23:40:12 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*f:sk:1482447, H*i:sk:1482447
X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients
X-HELO: mail-yb0-f193.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=tekul683ZOiMiIdZ85strT1c6cuLGmnHio11M1LKmEw=;
        b=RvuWmGjTZiE4W5JxVNmFuvnJ+4ieAHtrVPsGzyn9v/K/Cau9RzAv8xe2pYyByyTOA1
         JFOnanGhuOjo34ZZ7v6oFU5nMcxlgevAPU7Rs/YdxqfLKgFYDS86xCNgUijPMx9zBky9
         nWd3PbTehIfzrL8Zp69syXhCbNw4A1tNp5sgwPOtdZntE+1IZD1h2Qf435uq9Y77Qa3m
         /YOJ9WyAP8iXEVOaTuR5pokbyjTBbwL3osKQsNawVmGdJrkmmuX+xBBC9eJCeK6Dee7t
         EEAr4tTfo9NJ3H/kICzQ7vYR5n0jIKqFQcJ+HFeEwKAVF+RU0bjMkkkCBAPul0CNXEAV
         pBqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIKPHgBwdUbcLU1eKwPT0qxGvDg8yXR7tYOwvM+uiRgkvoQsDzrKO4rQSr1hJSRZaVcPDYvLBAI9bThkw==
X-Received: by 10.37.6.86 with SMTP id 83mr8234869ybg.32.1482450009646; Thu,
 22 Dec 2016 15:40:09 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1482447010.14990.815.camel@redhat.com>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612081855170.9769@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <1481576088-15304-1-git-send-email-omgalvan.86@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1612141820060.32751@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
 <CAN19L9GLm7Ey5ni=yrTQ7KioW2qF8rEHinincs85iS_2JKPmRQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN19L9FAbzN96JMV=i=o5LNic6ctRGUnoxYqSe09NvB-ZaTJMQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <cb8ede5a-f9ce-9d3b-9fe9-b6708c1388eb@sourceware.org> <CAN19L9FSEUW+1_0ziESsAd-Sr-Nd9gnk9jdTBPKiNnqmCQ2a8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1482424494.14990.810.camel@redhat.com> <CAN19L9Feu-=SAiwuTxsb1HNM96RhbrttFG7Q3O_AH=X942jRag@mail.gmail.com>
 <1482447010.14990.815.camel@redhat.com>
From: Martin Galvan <omgalvan.86@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2016 23:40:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAN19L9GEmszxLiGmUAiMYbiTXjs92jZ=pE3v-3iLwygXRoRE8g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] Add pretty printers for the NPTL lock types
To: Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>
Cc: siddhesh@sourceware.org, Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>, 
	libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00897.txt.bz2

2016-12-22 19:50 GMT-03:00 Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com>:
> I first thought it would pick the system gdb and not the one from $PATH.

What would be the difference between the "system gdb" and the one from
$PATH? Unless you altered your $PATH to make it point to the newly
built gdb, I don't understand what you mean.

>  It seems that the new gdb is used, but the test script
> still complaints that the gdb doesn't support python ('gdb must have
> python support to test the pretty printers.').  pexpect should be
> installed for the python that's used.  What am I doing wrong?

How did you come to the conclusion that the new gdb is being used?

In any case, I think it would be helpful to see the value of
gdb_python_error before the test script exits.