From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23000 invoked by alias); 23 Dec 2016 18:05:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 22985 invoked by uid 89); 23 Dec 2016 18:05:07 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy= X-Spam-User: qpsmtpd, 2 recipients X-HELO: mail-yw0-f176.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NFW9rfdjT6jsrvg4raiUfdAfF3jtQM2/fnYn9GO8myQ=; b=Ct1cd7iKzJz3F8DcJw0R0dUu+jZb5FCu76+dO5+TNy0EaQRZGBXbD/ttw7Oyr1eRfs dcCq1VtVTE/GtLxKOJmiNzb0loojseZCRdqBkGNrZ/jxVcBM2EsovE7MKLCidmep7/c6 MH4CvWwDHaQxzkBysxxcVbwA5BzRPJkj83tJxoIINFs/SuCw2dePdemnrHIj6zcXzUgM D9k7CGvMDfa22HbXP0QHh6P680fFttldlUZVeVu7ct7FgL7tqRnXBFznWJDkemY+vfAD HLLzEbTNgCOQYVFchc7K6Ao5JYFaVDcmadIWnPfwUcDeWvv1sxzxRBJmuDB3rX58hMwJ udYg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKIhXger4tzJsCOSKlV1IxZLVU21zU325yMibf7gIq/QgFvESIPSti69iX0CwESdwFvyDLNAzu5OT81uA== X-Received: by 10.129.158.87 with SMTP id v84mr3325909ywg.5.1482516304752; Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:05:04 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1481576088-15304-1-git-send-email-omgalvan.86@gmail.com> <1482424494.14990.810.camel@redhat.com> <1482447010.14990.815.camel@redhat.com> <1482512736.14990.831.camel@redhat.com> From: Martin Galvan Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 18:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] Add pretty printers for the NPTL lock types To: Torvald Riegel Cc: siddhesh@sourceware.org, Joseph Myers , libc-alpha@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2016-12/txt/msg00927.txt.bz2 2016-12-23 14:40 GMT-03:00 Martin Galvan : > That's really weird. In any case, if I understood correctly: you were > using the newly built --with-python gdb, and still got an error saying > that gdb doesn't have Python support? If not, what was the actual > error? Nevermind, I just understood what you meant. I wonder what was causing those escape sequences to appear, and if there's a way to disable them in older gdbs..