From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 83112 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2016 14:10:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 83092 invoked by uid 89); 18 Apr 2016 14:10:58 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=H*Ad:U*tom, printers X-HELO: mail-qg0-f53.google.com X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qZgY/mqA6DodpchT6/OotO6jP+0tos3kcas4Zb5Smg8=; b=DqaqDl9rwsakBZpqe9+YgNIePcyKn5xMunJt/xnfk4SucDnN7Dlspc+xosLBksIrjW XpXmiGyIrX0sMDzI9CE9Fl7hxlqCp6lgtGXKizX2/LFxM64Yijzj20xLW92o8kafTjm5 thV/RpF8z0tH3tthE2hm4kP3rTOs0EpiJeXWZXJSm1Y6ZFceSr076t8i76G8kvgViKr6 wN8WdNBXXyNiF2Ymc84T8gtbPybn4sQFoBX8mKEZReboe3G3dnFMf4CoOxf/H/M/Cn5u JmXvmOG394P4tYSxM6x+DmJmmQJftQ2xAnf8C9K8KOUnLCnk0nKJqCX8HLE3ApYxoHld s+Ww== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FX94M2fllh5R1fl3gXSn149T8mOyTnh35Redzwr/jCkbYX5Lhuj3vQIQgK2kF5ulzGF8A055BC8qa10JIPf X-Received: by 10.140.101.145 with SMTP id u17mr42438698qge.59.1460988645698; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 07:10:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1460472939-9725-1-git-send-email-martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com> <20160412155919.GG30851@devel.intra.reserved-bit.com> <20160412185626.GH30851@devel.intra.reserved-bit.com> From: Martin Galvan Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:10:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] Add pretty printers for the NPTL lock types To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, "Carlos O'Donell" , Tom Tromey , Daniel Gutson , Roland McGrath Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-SW-Source: 2016-04/txt/msg00433.txt.bz2 Pinging this since there was no response. On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Martin Galvan wrote: > So far it appears to be working fine. I'll fix the other cosmetic > issues and wait for Roland and Carlos' response before > sending v6.