From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <libc-alpha-return-75259-listarch-libc-alpha=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 67653 invoked by alias); 28 Nov 2016 16:00:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:libc-alpha-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 67579 invoked by uid 89); 28 Nov 2016 16:00:38 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=printers, NPTL, v11, pexpect
X-HELO: mail-oi0-f45.google.com
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
        h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
         :message-id:subject:to:cc;
        bh=PIeeZT25fWWt1saUuKsesFgIpNsl6DMCF0qOhQShPzE=;
        b=hORtrFHfWMpGLryLxIJo/jVjubID89V//MhAmadDElYTJLBQg+vpYVumT+wYz0ofiY
         Rczjrm3ekkgrAWBo67yD58K7CdnqG/lwJFcv8YtlIeaDAu9qn3y+pR3DxCVCqHGq0a8B
         NsxwS7Q7RrcDBUteoG4nvRLswwSVidepA22sX6+H9K42nHZ27NEOiAB7czSpBwgz90ZC
         vgbTbq39NSuz4Yr7wX3eE34zjAe4iKbpzRJI5/+AibumE/dFPcv9xRtAu96mjwfHUuwI
         LM2QMiqFEx15AOEj+UextzmhCI9fUN2hw+PT/JB4vd47NPDlbswFNJOtBvaHcCpjhI/J
         h/wA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC02zdtCfwO0ddp+k81BRWQDCKv429HKxzkPy3T9UzPU34EOZvYjfH9dreSPPH/n4+0itacAig7CNpK8h39J8
X-Received: by 10.157.12.203 with SMTP id o11mr12600892otd.31.1480348826596;
 Mon, 28 Nov 2016 08:00:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ca27e960-7aac-2c4e-4e30-9e1e397ba6bb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20161127030348.7579-1-martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com> <ca27e960-7aac-2c4e-4e30-9e1e397ba6bb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
From: Martin Galvan <martin.galvan@tallertechnologies.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:00:00 -0000
Message-ID: <CAOKbPbajorKoW05CmC814LpHdz9=QqURSBbsekn3vdWuQ8dUKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11] Add pretty printers for the NPTL lock types
To: Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, "Carlos O'Donell" <carlos@redhat.com>, 
	Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org, Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg01012.txt.bz2

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Stefan Liebler <stli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> as information:
> I`ve build and run testsuite on s390 (64/31bit) with debug information on a
> system with all the requirements and all the printer-tests pass.
> Without debug information, the attr-printer-tests are now marked unsupported
> as described in INSTALL and the other three printer-tests are passing.
>
> On a system without correct python/pexpect version, all the printer-tests
> are marked as unsupported.

Awesome. Thanks for the quick response, hopefully this patch can make
it to 2.25 without any further issues!