From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cr@cristianrodriguez.net>
Received: from mail-wr1-f52.google.com (mail-wr1-f52.google.com
 [209.85.221.52])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7962038515F7
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:57:48 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 7962038515F7
Received: by mail-wr1-f52.google.com with SMTP id a1so1567603wrh.10
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 14:57:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=Oj3InDsaOtTC/YLSjbMymjGt+xUkpHxFMwxRJFuu5cE=;
 b=pxAclU2dC9BMP0bCkZV3hSC+2jv0YV82n60iqW0Am5ywyIFjA3s0LYKTpTOuTSgVcf
 /yCOEkGEpaXJohTmW3/VwGpp5d9usbsK+VJC95lQaTHWH+xHfymHfxfUzDHe0z8v4yZY
 RYLK61FYWnZV0yoENu2eGu7KM8QUeQiGG02c8mplWd6h91svFmyUc4Cc7FEjTJcP4jUH
 VAigZP1XuToBbj8wps/sktHkZdTP63CSyjBnbSCj6RsEz1tl9paM8UoXuqMCDQhvfjl5
 S0jRr9pKn9lCxtVIiiHojtc3qOPlFlIjclhfTLPbQmPDH+aCYNlH5ZqFrexd9fsPenL+
 b0/w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530PgDmAd5AiISk4HFKbCGD34ASXlOL7XjDUFLRSTojaQPJTi3Dp
 XILQB2pg4f+Ic+a2PYuCupFoYftqJLk7ULFVNZ8h8J4ayto=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPnEaGwmbWAZZCZgUKfi28SZJGfloDxY1Myyoba7NpFsq2RxomfRceueGoAcjmxloq6UQaVm/w+OujgWtmgKQ=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:fcce:0:b0:203:dcdb:dd80 with SMTP id
 f14-20020adffcce000000b00203dcdbdd80mr5767907wrs.455.1648763867503; Thu, 31
 Mar 2022 14:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20220328220936.2724834-1-goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
 <c6837918-aa51-4e71-bbc8-74e522f1c0c9@linaro.org>
 <CAFUsyfJhWVw81=_5JJWU4t6NYwtpOQ4Fj+H2pFaV3GTiT9yBYw@mail.gmail.com>
 <7b48ece6-392a-0850-c136-01ab751273ef@linaro.org>
 <CAFUsyfLmPZmrKYdaKJXdd8i_piZXy2Uwij-qpAgibeHtZr_ssQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <72332228-093c-5186-789f-8616cfb93793@linaro.org>
 <CAFUsyfKiE1c0uoYCd7ktJnhmt0P0XcrmtM59zSsL-puE_AZafw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPBLoAccdvhGbTkxZCfzVbHrVrQT78jmxpErLW=i2qvLXABucg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHmME9q8XLzmPjYJV0yK6TK7BQbNEcoeEp0_9yW-+FxaUm+OcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPBLoAec_OCGDsC8-69L60=r-xRVvZEsMZmALj4HO6ZcpmC4=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <0198ce75-8a8e-4355-eed1-f69dfb6f40f0@linaro.org>
 <CAHmME9pQTd-xKN19j0HXqVhuzg+gbnEYGb3E2SmXaZFgjiz9yA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9pQTd-xKN19j0HXqVhuzg+gbnEYGb3E2SmXaZFgjiz9yA@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cristian_Rodr=C3=ADguez?= <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 18:57:35 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPBLoAd5ZVNTfykxUOSOz5=qSUUaurVwPqW7D20NJ8UXkwWUaA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] random-bits: Factor out entropy generating function
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>,
 Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>, 
 GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2022 21:57:50 -0000

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:32 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com> wrote:
>
> Just so we're on the same page here, is this a discussion about
> optimizing https://code.woboq.org/userspace/glibc/include/random-bits.h.html
> ?
>
> You just need a super fast random uint32_t for some future pthread changes?
>
> If so, I can send a patch to return moderately secure integers here really fast.
>
> Jason

That would be great if is better than the current solution.