From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <cr@cristianrodriguez.net>
Received: from mail-io1-f43.google.com (mail-io1-f43.google.com [209.85.166.43])
	by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E745392AC0B
	for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 20:17:40 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 8E745392AC0B
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=opensuse.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cristianrodriguez.net
Received: by mail-io1-f43.google.com with SMTP id h206so11577736iof.10
        for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2022 12:17:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
        h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references
         :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id
         :reply-to;
        bh=tvn7pe+Q51eALJ2Br+ln7bnqmUur57YXj4y3S8IChSw=;
        b=MMsF+oEa03eWWWv9iMI377JdelCukUgE85HzdMHOvqFdlFLyGWKDo1nt/PthHRhoU6
         0KU2DIapG/oM5+hjReFsLF962rzHpHZpd6fXGL7WlDlb5dlApdEOKwkBdW7hS9jjUkHu
         JhszvGVQ+5zkPj6toHD1O8ZIPaOsDmAHX/922PXV9KBH/Vycw6JXrYzMGcFBmnMHK39N
         irgIBDwU+40IV1S4JEsfB8BpwO93aLkr7T6h66c9vi1/h4OEwnvFmd5Pkkv/pHDyNzgv
         WRYtEykpQd9UHrWOf5cfAhpRBrQ/SF3aAgsmXRvWEV5i4Lg/7qSpPG1uSNndCGXB5HVf
         Gd+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ANoB5pleH8bPitWtaIfg3Fldk1G46P+nUiJpa6XNrpqRBeB1fFJ8ADF4
	9H/1KKFfBvRAw2KB+iNIoH2pBv7uTJRPdGQ/92HFykGIXfw=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA0mqf4Ybj01k/qwj8qboZANV4etxd6fdnbTu4PIqtwVPdHD42TyNWyFhv4CeydbMZelqEXnHMWwsHNYloIzXDVTbes=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:3cc3:b0:363:cdfd:3b94 with SMTP id
 bc3-20020a0566383cc300b00363cdfd3b94mr8831691jab.254.1668543459771; Tue, 15
 Nov 2022 12:17:39 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <AM5PR0801MB16680E6787BC0553E1847A0B83649@AM5PR0801MB1668.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <AM5PR0801MB16680E6787BC0553E1847A0B83649@AM5PR0801MB1668.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Cristian_Rodr=C3=ADguez?= <crrodriguez@opensuse.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2022 17:17:28 -0300
Message-ID: <CAPBLoAdB+RyMBcVb7tLpAMXhJWxBp3xc2ed91Vg=zF65ykBwvg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of libc locks
To: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>
Cc: GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org
List-Id: <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>

On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:23 PM Wilco Dijkstra via Libc-alpha
<libc-alpha@sourceware.org> wrote:
>
> Improve performance of libc locks by adding a fast path for the
> single-threaded case.
>
> On Neoverse V1, a loop using rand() improved 3.6 times. Multithreaded
> performance is unchanged.
>
> Passes regress on AArch64, OK for commit?
>
> ---
>

Ping ? I saw the stdio one was committed but what happened with this one ?