From: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>
To: "naohirot@fujitsu.com" <naohirot@fujitsu.com>
Cc: 'GNU C Library' <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
Szabolcs Nagy <Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Added optimized memcpy/memmove/memset for A64FX
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:13:51 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <VE1PR08MB55993A255FE21BA012D010C3835F9@VE1PR08MB5599.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TYAPR01MB60257AB96B99DA855B1B711DDF419@TYAPR01MB6025.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Naohiro,
> I believe that I've answered all of your comments so far.
> Please let me know if I missed something.
> If there is no further comments to the first version of this patch,
> I'd like to proceed with the preparation of the second version after
> the consecutive National holidays, Apr. 29th - May. 5th, in Japan.
I've only looked at memcpy so far. My comments on memcpy:
(1) Improve the tail code in unroll4/2/1/last to do the reverse of
shortcut_for_small_size - basically there is no need for loops or lots of branches.
(2) Rather than start with L2, check for n > L2_SIZE && vector_length == 64 and
start with the vl_agnostic case. Copies > L2_SIZE will be very rare so it's best to
handle the common case first.
(3) The alignment code can be significantly simplified. Why not just process
4 vectors unconditionally and then align the pointers? That avoids all the
complex code and is much faster.
(4) Is there a benefit of aligning src or dst to vector size in the vl_agnostic case?
If so, it would be easy to align to a vector first and then if n > L2_SIZE do the
remaining 3 vectors to align to a full cacheline.
(5) I'm not sure I understand the reason for src_notag/dest_notag. However if
you want to ignore tags, just change the mov src_ptr, src into AND that
clears the tag. There is no reason to both clear the tag and also keep the
original pointer and tag.
For memmove I would suggest to merge it with memcpy to save ~100 instructions.
I don't understand the complexity of the L(dispatch) code - you just need a simple
3-instruction overlap check that branches to bwd_unroll8.
I haven't looked at memset, but pretty much all the improvements apply there too.
>> I think the best option for now is to change BTI_C into NOP if AARCH64_HAVE_BTI
>> is not set. This avoids creating alignment issues in existing code (which is written
>> to assume the hint is present) and works for all string functions.
>
> I updated sysdeps/aarch64/sysdep.h following your advice [1].
>
> [1] https://github.com/NaohiroTamura/glibc/commit/c582917071e76cfed84fafb0c82cb70339294386
I meant using an actual NOP in the #else case so that existing string functions
won't change. Also note the #defines in the #if and #else need to be indented.
Cheers,
Wilco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-12 12:52 Wilco Dijkstra
2021-04-12 18:53 ` Florian Weimer
2021-04-13 12:07 ` naohirot
2021-04-14 16:02 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-04-15 12:20 ` naohirot
2021-04-20 16:00 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-04-27 11:58 ` naohirot
2021-04-29 15:13 ` Wilco Dijkstra [this message]
2021-04-30 15:01 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-04-30 15:23 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-04-30 15:30 ` Florian Weimer
2021-04-30 15:40 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-05-04 7:56 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-05-04 10:17 ` Florian Weimer
2021-05-04 10:38 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-05-04 10:42 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-05-04 11:07 ` Florian Weimer
2021-05-06 10:01 ` naohirot
2021-05-06 14:26 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-05-06 15:09 ` Florian Weimer
2021-05-06 17:31 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-05-07 12:31 ` naohirot
2021-04-19 2:51 ` naohirot
2021-04-19 14:57 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-04-21 10:10 ` naohirot
2021-04-21 15:02 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-04-22 13:17 ` naohirot
2021-04-23 0:58 ` naohirot
2021-04-19 12:43 ` naohirot
2021-04-20 3:31 ` naohirot
2021-04-20 14:44 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-04-27 9:01 ` naohirot
2021-04-20 5:49 ` naohirot
2021-04-20 11:39 ` Wilco Dijkstra
2021-04-27 11:03 ` naohirot
2021-04-23 13:22 ` naohirot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-17 2:28 Naohiro Tamura
2021-03-29 12:03 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-05-10 1:45 ` naohirot
2021-05-14 13:35 ` Szabolcs Nagy
2021-05-19 0:11 ` naohirot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=VE1PR08MB55993A255FE21BA012D010C3835F9@VE1PR08MB5599.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=wilco.dijkstra@arm.com \
--cc=Szabolcs.Nagy@arm.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=naohirot@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).