From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com (mail-pl1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9358C3857404 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 22:18:49 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9358C3857404 Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id y1so5419859plk.10 for ; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:18:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=6F0RU01NCqDSF1WXig2iPmwEd51SuR0xLpyALFCWC64=; b=qAEikIfHqNBNZvGM26TyfhoZtnNkri3Sift9gheYf2MzB5Sg3RJO26ZNhVXzLdzCH/ XhhJEx0FmNdG8rfuQ7e0fkhbRjjyRcIjFlMPNhxL57QaAO0hpdrUS+EDQQvIvLt+ARH/ 0yNo6jT9GOixDaCqkux8T70hKZ05YZoy9n1qeO/y3DzaOnJ4MG6Xm0+purSWTaqU7qQg 9qiYfeVNOkFf8f0mcWPf+QW6mRDwbB1nmwgdkIOhPXtaJkTBZs5+ADuMwsvm1GDUqHhn /lcjvC2576qlitAWSpWPMQNkuTUoX+U/2y0VOnHDGj9x2JrWb+r1c67h1QSCN1l7cu9X Q91g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5302Uli+4CcZIzt0FBGrusMYMRwLmN+hDbw9XWLf2TtZysjRLR8v TNEbRlQZt9xnbo1bubMO8D4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxYfFzdfvEoK9n52UHWLW1ovSAaVZcxm9GpGpadZ63BDxUJptILDNg/vCAUDC5mJeD+ajk4cQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:2bca:: with SMTP id n10mr7494662pje.241.1635459528757; Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2409:10:24a0:4700:e8ad:216a:2a9d:6d0c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id nr14sm3715826pjb.24.2021.10.28.15.18.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 28 Oct 2021 15:18:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 07:18:45 +0900 From: Stafford Horne To: Joseph Myers Cc: GLIBC patches Subject: Re: Upstreaming OpenRISC with GCC mainline Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2021 22:18:52 -0000 On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 09:45:51PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 29 Oct 2021, Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 05:15:00PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > > > On Thu, 28 Oct 2021, Stafford Horne via Libc-alpha wrote: > > > > > > > I was seeing failures there and thought the warnings I was seeing were > > > > affecting all architectures. But now I see the builds are mostly clean. > > > > So it's something I'll have to track down. > > > > > > The only issue I know of at present with GCC mainline is the testsuite > > > build failures for 32-bit platforms that are addressed by my patch > > > . > > > > Thanks, yes I saw that patch. > > > > I am trying to compare builds of multiple architectures. I do see similar > > errors on riscv32. I am continuing to try looking at other architectures, but > > just wanted to note this: > > > > FAIL: compilers-riscv32-linux-gnu-rv32imac-ilp32 glibc riscv32-linux-gnu-rv32imac-ilp32 build > > Since I don't see this, do you have environment variables set (e.g. > CFLAGS) that might perturb the build? You're not meant to have such > variables set when running build-many-glibcs.py, and can definitely expect > additional warnings with -O1 or -O3, for example. (We *should* fix things > to build cleanly with -O1 and -O3 and -Os and -Og, and even -O0, but > that's a separate issue.) Thats it, I have -Og setup in my build environment. I must have missed where that was mentioned. -Stafford