From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mark@klomp.org>
Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7D1E385840C
 for <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:12:19 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org E7D1E385840C
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org;
 dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org
Received: from reform (unknown [178.228.156.55])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA511300070C;
 Wed, 17 Aug 2022 15:12:18 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 462F52E81D4F; Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:53:49 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:53:49 +0200
From: Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>
To: Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@fitzsim.org>
Cc: Wilco Dijkstra <Wilco.Dijkstra@arm.com>,
 Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
 'GNU C Library' <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of IO locks
Message-ID: <YvzWzc0XP3sREol3@wildebeest.org>
References: <AM5PR0801MB1668EAA428F59B3F89184FDC83A49@AM5PR0801MB1668.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <AM5PR0801MB1668FF146572E2069648B5F1839A9@AM5PR0801MB1668.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <YvrIWdEpyBSh9prn@wildebeest.org> <m3h72c3mzs.fsf@fitzsim.org>
 <878rnoeja2.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
 <AM5PR0801MB16684E546674DEAA3041BCFE836B9@AM5PR0801MB1668.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
 <m3czd02upa.fsf@fitzsim.org> <m31qtg2ras.fsf@fitzsim.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m31qtg2ras.fsf@fitzsim.org>
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,
 KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: libc-alpha@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Libc-alpha mailing list <libc-alpha.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/options/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/>
List-Post: <mailto:libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/libc-alpha>,
 <mailto:libc-alpha-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2022 13:12:21 -0000

Hi Tom.

On Tue, Aug 16, 2022 at 10:31:39AM -0400, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
> Before setting this up, I checked the system's package list.  This
> builder is running Debian unstable, without unattended upgrades, so some
> of the toolchain packages were out-of-date.
> 
> I did an upgrade (388 packages) and the issue seems to have disappeared,
> so this was likely a toolchain bug that has since been fixed.  I have
> the list of old and new package versions if anyone's interested.
> 
> Anyway, I think glibc-debian-ppc64 builds will succeed now.

It did!
https://builder.sourceware.org/buildbot/#builders/128/builds/182

Thanks,

Mark