From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 005983858D39 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:15:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 005983858D39 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1664468136; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=us++bQNORi1+GZtwxdrjkwkwwEsIT3uK4/A60Z7bM6Y=; b=Muh3n+DONUN72QNzL3lirQb+tOot1R+/0H4FUxzAfI6i9cLlPvkX0O7hXbmFVyK4KNG5mx 5v6oBOsHJh6C0dlJAw5CZcwAgrYCSU1qCq91GTrsXZsPfhYQ1BZ0BYFis+GiRvHT+iqSFO 0Nu+or8yvOQsR+0hxwGgaQKPGvUHvu8= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-538-_nBsNvryMFGod81VUjoOtw-1; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:15:35 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _nBsNvryMFGod81VUjoOtw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0812A18ABF82; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:15:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (unknown [10.39.192.194]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD00E492B04; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 16:15:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tucnak.zalov.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPS id 28TGFVcw3938533 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:15:32 +0200 Received: (from jakub@localhost) by tucnak.zalov.cz (8.17.1/8.17.1/Submit) id 28TGFVot3938532; Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:15:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 18:15:31 +0200 From: Jakub Jelinek To: Joseph Myers Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Fix iseqsig for _FloatN and _FloatNx in C++ with GCC 13 Message-ID: Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,KAM_NUMSUBJECT,KAM_SHORT,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 12:15:09AM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > Tested with build-many-glibcs.py glibcs build for aarch64-linux-gnu > ia64-linux-gnu i686-linux-gnu mips-linux-gnu mips64-linux-gnu-n32 > powerpc-linux-gnu powerpc64le-linux-gnu x86_64-linux-gnu. Note that > there is an ICE building the glibc testsuite for x86_64 / i686 / ia64 > , which will need > to be resolved to complete testing this patch. I've posted a fix for that. > I am seeking review of this patch, not applying it as a math > maintainer. Also, full testing will need GCC bug 107080 (test reduced > from an ICE building the glibc testcase modified by this patch) to be > fixed. LGTM. Reviewed-by: Jakub Jelinek Jakub