From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wr1-x42e.google.com (mail-wr1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42e]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 916543858D3C for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2024 07:37:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 916543858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 916543858D3C Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::42e ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1707032245; cv=none; b=skr3nrhConqfMKRA7mGgLpvCwL5SJ0FWW9OSvZC+KDMwc461fDod3AxWTQgBcQP5WAgAGQ7/C+OHr5x8rxjg8vZn/RG2lBlN1TlndTaVOTEjOBn3VTG/z0WthxZk6FTZSJ8eTcHyXMgGgFN63Xmv6VrhaozK7WaO53zoZCB1oao= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1707032245; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IsEFhnZRT3FfRTu3gFO7ClaDNr4xKsOAFR7raAU9Ax4=; h=DKIM-Signature:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=FfOZVO3FA66dAdUv+XzFyLIMCiq8s4f+xDITOhXG/nNkZ4LDjQYg6rHwY/s4BVfyT5R30sQboAN7UbQ3D64s04MkGgU+ebI72pIeImW0oQa3KDFdz0XMz0tKVOCLkuteoLw7uaPhY9Pw7fcPQ6pUToxPXiqUtr42GeO73kgapaU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: by mail-wr1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-33b2ee2d1d6so566261f8f.1 for ; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 23:37:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1707032242; x=1707637042; darn=sourceware.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=6DnzCjeJtPTsZSKdqkN9Oxjy51Iyn/0efo7sFnJjRI4=; b=gkgT6iuqepdphbtPu6guCOA0rqGl95fSJz739NpcSNRxM+n04l7Qodoiw0wdKp+m4N dxzHwN6YvoCk4HWsUr4GkjaLiCCG4sM19tR3GJU/tImk35rH7vTapiZLnFXixAPJM6ZI wAU0fTwwWMuJMsiOW+8RWDvJhkFTLbc2HW+Li+G+LqLZ5u9xnAd6jbsgeSMwkJJTx1nu 2YMchnZgcmAz1BdpUDl2/RuN9Q2xoeVFTL84ASjhBRfc2bl17HliuU9eioRxNKh0QY7u Cj5f4xEaoF5AkDnwv+VK9NfiDwSlA6f/sxY13tFaoYN+WyMXHbMfndzT1flQtmO6grJS B9yQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1707032242; x=1707637042; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=6DnzCjeJtPTsZSKdqkN9Oxjy51Iyn/0efo7sFnJjRI4=; b=K8PMvLXL9UVHvRf5Tgfpnv+ZTV0xHHCEMbXzGJI2MhoDTEbPkb3FdlmnpAymnKG3NI Rg4b7PoCjdTigytVVOjOFCDQ+MXljkgJmX0f5WrXNxtg8iEfXxcmd1QVDCj2ON65YFfq wb8KqemsQyd+svSq3jZT8y5wpu76lZJP0yxiaQX4u7Gwk4AdPVe0fjx86B3L5SLe9hAp sHXkSbgonFdzHKi+F+NOG+6JKLEVM+HdhSp/cGEz8TxSu95bl/a4D9LrEed65mz+Xq9p HmLJS00B474YAMpDmG5tZvkXnJ7v5/gBMkFcOmVbX7XVoddjUWXsIVNcrFCvSIzW7Qqc IYBw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwyFvH9wNX1VOkiXjGqhKsQmUyUv0wN38Kg44pudymvdSRDBPo/ JCZeWbYet7xDlOP4aHApzTbKnFn1uc015TN1IS5csugXmuwh3WarOPMr7WQI X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFmgxIrQNXd/Akdy3l9WGOJkOi7wxM8WRzalMV5adp/PN23iZI+FO8B6sJ2YdVp2b6scFK5UA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:9b8f:0:b0:33a:e9dd:dc20 with SMTP id d15-20020adf9b8f000000b0033ae9dddc20mr4682992wrc.43.1707032242029; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 23:37:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (cpc1-brnt4-2-0-cust862.4-2.cable.virginm.net. [86.9.131.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t8-20020a5d6a48000000b0033b07f428b6sm5505816wrw.0.2024.02.03.23.37.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 03 Feb 2024 23:37:20 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 07:37:19 +0000 From: Stafford Horne To: "Andreas K. Huettel" Cc: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: state of the ports Message-ID: References: <4155299.iIbC2pHGDl@noumea> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4155299.iIbC2pHGDl@noumea> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 03:35:04AM +0100, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > So... after all the testing gone into the release I thought I'd summarize a bit > for the list here - by sorting the glibc ports into "excellent", "good", "medium", > "bad", and "nobody even tried". > > Feel free to correct my assessment... Most of the underlying info is on the > 2.39 release wiki page. > > Cheers, > Andreas > > > 1. EXCELLENT > ============ > > aarch64 > - tests pass nearly everywhere > - on raspi, likely timeouts > > arm-linux-gnueabi (soft-float) > arm-linux-gnueabihf (hard-float) > - one mystery test failure (elf/tst-align3) > > loongarch64 > - tests pass > > powerpc64 > powerpc64le > - tests pass > > s390x > - tests pass > > x86-64 > - tests pass > > x86-64 (x32) > - one expected failure, tests pass otherwise > > > 2. GOOD > ============ > > powerpc64 > ppc 32bit hf > - one failure that indicates something broken (nptl/tst-thread-exit-clobber) > > riscv64 > - ~5 failures, but there may be timeouts among them > > s390 (31bit) > - two failures due to gcc breakage (gmon/tst-gmon-pie*) > > sparc > - ~5 failures (!) > > x86 (32bit) > - in general tests pass > - there may be breakage on old hw (pentium2) > > > 3. MEDIUM > ============ > > ARC > - 11 failures > > hppa2.0 > - 12 failures (on ~20 year old hw! that's actually good) > > > 4. BAD > ============ > > Debian > - OK not really a port :) but it seems there are some machines where > broken Debian installs lead to massive amounts of FAIL > > mips (o32) > - actually broken right now, it seems, the tests came too late > > mips (n64) > - mostly math failures > > riscv32 > - 37 failures across the board > > > 99. NOBODY TRIED > ================= > > alpha > > c-sky > > hppa1.1 > > m68k > > microblaze > > mips64 (N32) > > niosii > > openrisc Hello, I it unfortunate that openrisc ended up in NOBODY TRIED, I usually try to test the port for each release. However, this time the testing mail slipped through my mail filters. Note, during "glibc 2.36 - Machine testing." Carlos CCed each maintainer on the announcement mail. This makes it easier for us maintainers to know we need to take action. Can maintainers be CCed on these announcements going forward? For 2.39, I see the main only went to the list. -Stafford