From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 99304 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2018 14:31:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 99199 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jun 2018 14:31:01 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=eligible, compound, Hx-languages-length:493, oleh X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Subject: Re: [RFC 0/1] Contributing a compound object to the libpthread To: Oleh Derevenko , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <1522762896.2654.94.camel@codethink.co.uk> From: Florian Weimer Message-ID: Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2018 14:31:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SW-Source: 2018-06/txt/msg00440.txt.bz2 On 06/15/2018 04:05 PM, Oleh Derevenko wrote: > Could it be that a project like libc does not have a group of people > eligible for making decisive judgements and saying "yes" or "no" on > behalf of it? Or do you need more time? You said you want to avoid “misuse within commercial so[f]tware”. I don't see how you can do that while still contributing to glibc, so I didn't look at your proposal in detail. Thanks, Florian