From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 48328 invoked by alias); 30 Nov 2016 08:58:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 48305 invoked by uid 89); 30 Nov 2016 08:58:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=pursue, H*RU:!192.168.1.100!, H*r:ip*192.168.1.100, Hx-spam-relays-external:!192.168.1.100! X-HELO: mail.pacific.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] manual: Refactor header and standards annotations. References: <20161123063807.14845-1-ricaljasan@pacific.net> <20161123063807.14845-2-ricaljasan@pacific.net> <52a4b7bf-3a5a-8194-a18a-6b523e12acad@pacific.net> <1230cb0d-b2e3-ab86-363b-c1bf56bca621@pacific.net> Cc: Joseph Myers , Michael Kerrisk , "Carlos O'Donell" From: Rical Jasan To: libc-alpha@sourceware.org Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:58:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Null-Tag: 2570079b23c4f4de4223709f034ecbed X-SW-Source: 2016-11/txt/msg01082.txt.bz2 On 11/25/2016 06:25 AM, Joseph Myers wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Rical Jasan wrote: > >> What should I do with summary.awk? Replace it or stick to syntax >> checking only? I've been calling mine check-stds.pl but it could become > > I'm not making a particular assertion about whether the scripts should be > combined or not (provided that any replacement for summary.awk generates > identical output, given any required fixes to the manual sources). Just an update, I've pared down the script I had to something suitable for a purely automated syntax-checker, and I'll include it with a v2 along with the other issues mentioned. I won't touch summary.awk because once we change the entire standards annotation framework, both summary.awk and the new script will need to be rewritten anyway, so I think it would be better to pursue a combined script at that stage. Rical