From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>,
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>,
Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>,
Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/2] Makeconfig: Compile glibc with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:53:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a413761c-2909-6c52-4140-ffe335a91372@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875y6qbm5c.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
On 2023-07-11 09:41, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
> * Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha:
>
>> Don't undefine __nonnull to prevent compiler optimizations. Instead,
>> tell the compiler to not optimize based on the attribute, via the
>> appropriate flag.
>
> The manual for GCC 13 says:
>
> For function definitions:
> • If the compiler determines that a function parameter that is
> marked with nonnull is compared with null, and
> ‘-Wnonnull-compare’ option is enabled, a warning is issued.
> *Note Warning Options::.
> • The compiler may also perform optimizations based on the
> knowledge that ‘nonnull’ parameters cannot be null. This can
> currently not be disabled other than by removing the nonnull
> attribute.
>
> So this isn't actually equivalent today, and I think it impacts our
> ability to deal with null pointer errors in the implementation (in
> function definitions).
+1, this situation is equivalent to why we remove the access attribute
during fortification too; it hinders the ability of the implementation
to do those checks at runtime.
Thanks,
Sid
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-11 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-11 13:11 [RFC v1 0/2] Use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks to build glibc Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:11 ` [RFC v1 1/2] Makeconfig: Use one line per token Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 18:05 ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-07-11 13:11 ` [RFC v1 2/2] Makeconfig: Compile glibc with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:41 ` Florian Weimer
2023-07-11 13:53 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2023-07-12 10:56 ` Richard Biener
2023-07-12 12:22 ` Cristian Rodríguez
2023-07-12 12:43 ` Florian Weimer
2023-07-11 13:18 ` [RFC v1 0/2] Use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks to build glibc Florian Weimer
2023-07-11 13:19 ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:22 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-07-11 13:24 ` Alejandro Colomar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a413761c-2909-6c52-4140-ffe335a91372@gotplt.org \
--to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
--cc=alx@kernel.org \
--cc=apinski@marvell.com \
--cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=rguenth@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=sam@gentoo.org \
--cc=xry111@xry111.site \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).