public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@gotplt.org>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>,
	Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Cc: Alejandro Colomar <alx@kernel.org>,
	Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xry111.site>, Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>,
	Richard Biener <rguenth@gcc.gnu.org>,
	Andrew Pinski <apinski@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 2/2] Makeconfig: Compile glibc with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:53:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a413761c-2909-6c52-4140-ffe335a91372@gotplt.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <875y6qbm5c.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

On 2023-07-11 09:41, Florian Weimer via Libc-alpha wrote:
> * Alejandro Colomar via Libc-alpha:
> 
>> Don't undefine __nonnull to prevent compiler optimizations.  Instead,
>> tell the compiler to not optimize based on the attribute, via the
>> appropriate flag.
> 
> The manual for GCC 13 says:
> 
>       For function definitions:
>          • If the compiler determines that a function parameter that is
>            marked with nonnull is compared with null, and
>            ‘-Wnonnull-compare’ option is enabled, a warning is issued.
>            *Note Warning Options::.
>          • The compiler may also perform optimizations based on the
>            knowledge that ‘nonnull’ parameters cannot be null.  This can
>            currently not be disabled other than by removing the nonnull
>            attribute.
> 
> So this isn't actually equivalent today, and I think it impacts our
> ability to deal with null pointer errors in the implementation (in
> function definitions).

+1, this situation is equivalent to why we remove the access attribute 
during fortification too; it hinders the ability of the implementation 
to do those checks at runtime.

Thanks,
Sid

  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-11 13:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-11 13:11 [RFC v1 0/2] Use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks to build glibc Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:11 ` [RFC v1 1/2] Makeconfig: Use one line per token Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 18:05   ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2023-07-11 13:11 ` [RFC v1 2/2] Makeconfig: Compile glibc with -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:41   ` Florian Weimer
2023-07-11 13:53     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar [this message]
2023-07-12 10:56   ` Richard Biener
2023-07-12 12:22     ` Cristian Rodríguez
2023-07-12 12:43     ` Florian Weimer
2023-07-11 13:18 ` [RFC v1 0/2] Use -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks to build glibc Florian Weimer
2023-07-11 13:19   ` Alejandro Colomar
2023-07-11 13:22 ` Xi Ruoyao
2023-07-11 13:24   ` Alejandro Colomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a413761c-2909-6c52-4140-ffe335a91372@gotplt.org \
    --to=siddhesh@gotplt.org \
    --cc=alx@kernel.org \
    --cc=apinski@marvell.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=rguenth@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=sam@gentoo.org \
    --cc=xry111@xry111.site \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).