public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>
To: libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@redhat.com>,
	Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
Subject: What is our SLA for going from reserved CVE to published CVE?
Date: Wed, 1 May 2024 22:12:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ab1df515-18fa-4d2b-836b-543da608ded3@redhat.com> (raw)

Raising this on libc-alpha for a broader discussion.

For CVE-2024-33599, CVE-2024-33600, CVE-2024-33601 and CVE-2024-33602
the glibc security team has not yet published the CVE IDs, only reserved
the block.

I have just completed filling in the advisories and have all the data
for publishing them along with publishing the CVE IDs [1].

I could have published the CVE IDs *earlier* but my reading of the CNA
rules is that:
~~~
2.2.3 SHOULD provide the CVE Record information within 24 hours of
publishing the CVE ID.
~~~

So once I publish the CVE ID I need to move quickly to fill in all the
record information... which I don't have until I complete the
advisory text.

For these CVE IDs it will have been ~7-8 days to publish, which is too
long IMO, but we can improve that.

Under embargo was certainly easier because the timeline gives us time
to write the advisory text and get it ready for publishing.

Would it be better if we just published interm text and updated as we go?

-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.

[1] https://inbox.sourceware.org/libc-alpha/20240502020121.3267018-1-carlos@redhat.com/T/#m749caf9d5b5e7093efe1bb2ae4cb413ec9749ad4


             reply	other threads:[~2024-05-02  2:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-02  2:12 Carlos O'Donell [this message]
2024-05-02  4:06 ` DJ Delorie
2024-05-02 10:35 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-05-02 10:46   ` Florian Weimer
2024-05-15 18:32     ` Carlos O'Donell
2024-05-15 18:36       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2024-05-16  7:21         ` Adhemerval Zanella Netto
2024-05-16 11:16           ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ab1df515-18fa-4d2b-836b-543da608ded3@redhat.com \
    --to=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=siddhesh@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).