Re: Seeking feedback for the adoption of a Code of Conduct for glibc.

[Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>]

On 11/6/23 17:28, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> It is critical that we support the growing and continued diversity of our
> community by providing in writing the expectations that we have for our
> conduct.
> 
> With both gcc [1] and binutils [2] having adopted a CoC I have created a
> glibc Code of Conduct based on the one for gcc.
> 
> Over the course of the next month (November) I would like to get feedback
> from the community about adopting a CoC.
> 
> I would like to hear from the other project stewards on this decision.
> 
> Drafts of all the documents are available on the glibc wiki:
> 
> "glibc Code of Conduct"
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/CoC/Conduct 
> 
> "glibc Code of Conduct Response Guide"
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/CoC/ResponseGuide
> 
> "glibc Code of Conduct Reporting Guide"
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/CoC/ReportingGuidelines
> 
> "glibc Code of Conduct Committee"
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/CoC/Committee
> 
> "glibc Code of Conduct FAQ"
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/CoC/FAQ
> 
> "glibc CoCC Transparency Reports"
> https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/CoC/TransparencyReports (empty boiler plate)
> 
> Thank you for all of your support and for reviewing these documents.
> 

I had a really good question offline about the differences between
the codes of conduct so I updated the FAQ with that question.

Updated the FAQ:
https://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/CoC/FAQ
~~~
= How is this different from the GCC Code of Conduct? =

The glibc Code of Conduct is a copy of the GCC Code of Conduct with 
references to the GCC Steering Committee replaced with the glibc
stewards and the mailing address changed.

Aside form the straight forward replacements the code of conduct
between glibc and gcc should be identical. 
~~~

Nick,

When you wrote the binutils CoC did you intend to make it match
the gcc CoC? Were there any substantive changes?


-- 
Cheers,
Carlos.