From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from forward501c.mail.yandex.net (forward501c.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c03:500:1:45:d181:d501]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A3263858D1E for ; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 15:01:26 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 8A3263858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=yandex.ru Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=yandex.ru Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-69.iva.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-69.iva.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c0c:610a:0:640:be20:0]) by forward501c.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 4ACB45F6E9; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:01:24 +0300 (MSK) Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-69.iva.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id K1K1Wf3DWKo0-TLZrq4ab; Wed, 29 Mar 2023 18:01:23 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1680102084; bh=GlXd+yAw3nvDvkC4UGMneMVSdDs821F6r+QZYMT6RLM=; h=In-Reply-To:From:Date:References:To:Subject:Message-ID; b=b/RBsF00efPVZ8hQhvWjC/f56pn2NXS4+mPYYhUyR0UcmFEygoIhwW8f4YLaHNj+I Okei4WvWtUBUdlR0/GjEq8Vwgps4XGiK4/i9YFoVaC3ps4yHSCYP+58IqhOa5slZpc +nuojhqua15hK8fZXrImNghxBZ4kBJt19gDkmhoA= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-69.iva.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.ru Message-ID: Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2023 20:01:18 +0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] dlfcn,elf: implement dlmem() [BZ #11767] Content-Language: en-US To: Adhemerval Zanella Netto , Jonathon Anderson , Carlos O'Donell , libc-alpha@sourceware.org References: <20230318165110.3672749-1-stsp2@yandex.ru> <20230318165110.3672749-13-stsp2@yandex.ru> <3541bbd7-8a68-2064-bb63-2a921cfe3bb1@yandex.ru> <630fa17528c6050d60f524aa88ad5a057cae1603.camel@rice.edu> From: stsp In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,BODY_8BITS,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: 29.03.2023 19:31, Adhemerval Zanella Netto пишет: > This should be other way around since you are the one proposing a new > interface and thus should make sure that potential raised concerns > indeed does not affect it. > > Also, I would like to ask to tune down your tone. This kind of aggressive > way to present technical topics, in a manner of adding 'challengers' to > put pressure on person that raised concerns is not best way and usually > make other developers to avoid engage further in the topic. I understand and apologize to Jonathon, but there is some misunderstanding that can't be solved unless the problem is demonstrated. I very carefully inspected my v9 code and indeed it had a few bugs in that area, but they are not fatal and will all be covered in v10. I very much doubt someone else also found these bugs, so why my implementation is blamed in not arranging the elf segments by vaddr's, is essentially unclear! Do you, Adhemerval, know why my impl is suspected in not arranging an elf segments properly? I'll have to ask everyone personally it seems, and maybe someone provides a clue finally.