public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Carlos O'Donell <carlos@redhat.com>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>,
	"Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@altlinux.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve DST handling (Bug 23102, Bug 21942, Bug 18018, Bug, 23259, CVE-2011-0536 ).
Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2018 12:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afafa405-4546-e090-9f16-cde625e77480@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1c08bd2-2010-8ba9-5d44-6826aafe5bc5@redhat.com>

On 06/06/2018 10:18 PM, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> +/* Process INPUT for DSTs and store in RESULT using the information from
> +   link map L to resolve the DSTs.  The value of START must equal the
> +   start of the parent string if INPUT is a substring sequence being
> +   parsed with path separators e.g. $ORIGIN:$PLATFORM.  */
>   char *
> -_dl_dst_substitute (struct link_map *l, const char *name, char *result)
> +_dl_dst_substitute (struct link_map *l, const char *start,
> +		    const char *input, char *result)

The comment should describe the storage requirements for RESULT.

I'm a bit worried about this:

	  else if (len != 0)
	    {
	      /* We cannot use this path element, the value of the
		 replacement is unknown.  */
	      check_for_trusted = false;
	      wp = last_elem;
	      break;
	    }

Does this really do the right thing for $ORIGIN/../$LIB:/foo/$ORIGIN?  I 
would have expected a trusted path check for the first component in this 
case.

Thanks,
Florian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-06-07 12:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-06  5:03 Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-06 14:01 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-06 14:55   ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-06 14:17 ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-06 15:59   ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-06 15:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-06 16:01   ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-06 16:10 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-06 16:31   ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-06 17:10     ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-06 17:28       ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-06 18:49         ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-06 18:56           ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-06 20:04             ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-07  6:49       ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-08  2:08         ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-11  8:04           ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-12  3:08             ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-12  7:31               ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-12 12:46                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-12 13:02                   ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-12 13:03                     ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-06 20:19   ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-07 11:38     ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08  2:14       ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-07 12:16     ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2018-06-08  4:15       ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-08  5:21         ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08  5:46           ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-08  5:50             ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-07 12:43     ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08  5:37       ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-08  5:45     ` [PATCH v4] " Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-08  5:51       ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-08  6:03         ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-08  6:25           ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-11  2:55             ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-11  7:28               ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-11 14:44                 ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-12  3:46       ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-12 13:08         ` [PATCH v6] " Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-12 13:20           ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-12 13:23             ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-12 14:10               ` Carlos O'Donell
2018-06-12 14:34                 ` Andreas Schwab
2018-06-12 14:31           ` Florian Weimer
2018-06-12 14:36             ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afafa405-4546-e090-9f16-cde625e77480@redhat.com \
    --to=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=carlos@redhat.com \
    --cc=ldv@altlinux.org \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).