From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 53635 invoked by alias); 28 May 2015 17:21:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact libc-alpha-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: libc-alpha-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 53619 invoked by uid 89); 28 May 2015 17:21:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: relay1.mentorg.com Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 17:54:00 -0000 From: Joseph Myers To: Carlos O'Donell CC: Chris Metcalf , Adhemerval Zanella , GNU C Library Subject: Re: [PATCH] tile: use better variable naming in INLINE_SYSCALL In-Reply-To: <5564DB29.7020109@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <1432664355-10269-1-git-send-email-cmetcalf@ezchip.com> <5564DB29.7020109@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00796.txt.bz2 On Tue, 26 May 2015, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > Established practice appears to be to use `sc_err`. > > A quick look shows that other sysdep.h also suffer this problem, > but have been lucky that nobody uses `sc_ret` or similarly named > variables in the outer scope. > > Doesn't this also impact MIPS, Microblaze, SPARC and NIOS2? Have you filed a bug for this (preferably one per architecture, architecture maintainers CC:ed), or do you intend to fix it yourself (per standard glibc practice, if you find a bug you aren't fixing, you should file it in Bugzilla)? -- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com